2015
DOI: 10.1080/1023666x.2015.975414
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wide Band Gap Transparent Polymer-Inorganic Composite Thin Films by Dip-Coating Method: Preparation and Characterizations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed trend of transmittance with annealing temperature is in good agreement with early reported work in literature [34]. The increase in transmittance with increase in annealing temperature leads to reduction in the surface diffusion and voids [35]. It clearly indicates that the increase in annealing temperature leads to improvement of surface smoothness and decrease in thickness, grain boundary scattering, rms surface roughness [36].…”
Section: 5supporting
confidence: 80%
“…The observed trend of transmittance with annealing temperature is in good agreement with early reported work in literature [34]. The increase in transmittance with increase in annealing temperature leads to reduction in the surface diffusion and voids [35]. It clearly indicates that the increase in annealing temperature leads to improvement of surface smoothness and decrease in thickness, grain boundary scattering, rms surface roughness [36].…”
Section: 5supporting
confidence: 80%
“…The theoretical and experimental band-gap values, suggest the potential suitability of this type of compound for optoelectronic applications [55]. It may also be noted that these band gaps are comparable with inorganic materials used in optoelectronic device applications [56][57][58].…”
Section: Frontier Molecular Orbital (Fmo) and Uv-vis Absorptionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The transmittance reduction is, thus, signi cant for 21-28 µm thin MFC-ATHw lms (from about 86% to about 25-48% at 30 and 50 w/w% of ATH addition, respectively), while its changing in the case of MFC-ATHp lms is much smaller (between 96.8-89.4%) compared to the pure MFC lm, although they are thicker (23-32 µm) and more dependent on the particle size than on their content. The reason for such a difference could be in the different crystalline structure, morphologically larger (40-48 nm), lower SSA (18.9-59.5 m 2 /g), aggregated and less uniform ATHw nanoparticles than ATHp ones (21-31 nm), with much higher SSA (385.4-377.7 m 2 /g), which, consequently, blocks the light transmission (Sathish et al 2015). This can also be supported by increasing the transmittance values by increasing the wavelength for both MFC-ATHw lms (from 47% and 35% at 400 nm to 59% and 49% at 700 nm for MFC lms containing ATH40w and ATH50w, respectively).…”
Section: Surface Morphological and Physico-chemical Properties Of Thementioning
confidence: 99%