2008 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM - The 27th Conference on Computer Communications 2008
DOI: 10.1109/infocom.2007.148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wide-Area IP Network Mobility

et al.

Abstract: Abstract-IP network mobility is emerging as a major paradigm for providing continuous Internet access while a set of users are on the move in a transportation system. The intense interest on its support has led to the establishment of the NEMO IETF working group and a test-deployment by a major airline equipment vendor -Boeing -on major airline routes. However, the previously proposed solutions are either inefficient or may cause instability to the global Internet. In this paper, we propose WINMO, a simple, sy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As FGA takes as its design concept Smart Core, Dumb End hosts, and Intelligent Floating Routers, the required installation into existing components is limited to the mobile network side. NEMO extensions (UMA [16], MIRON [5]) require additional functional cooperation from existing components, while WINMO [10] introduces different component behavior with their extensions. On the other hand, FGA only replaces Mobile Router functionality of NEMO and does not require the cooperation of the access network.…”
Section: Transparent Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As FGA takes as its design concept Smart Core, Dumb End hosts, and Intelligent Floating Routers, the required installation into existing components is limited to the mobile network side. NEMO extensions (UMA [16], MIRON [5]) require additional functional cooperation from existing components, while WINMO [10] introduces different component behavior with their extensions. On the other hand, FGA only replaces Mobile Router functionality of NEMO and does not require the cooperation of the access network.…”
Section: Transparent Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are plenty of solutions to tackle this nested NEMO problem [15]; Light-NEMO [20] uses tunnel concatenation, MIRON [5] configures CoA with address delegation cooperate with access router, HAHA [28] migrates distributed home agents at the infrastructure side, WINMO [10] uses BGP infrastructure to distribute optimized prefix of mobile network, Correspondent Router [27] introduces new router functionality at the correspondent node side to bypass the redundant path. While these existing solutions introduce additional functionality to the nonmobile network side (which is not the main entity involved by the movement), FGA only involves mobile entities to achieve route optimization.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%