2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cryogenics.2016.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wicking of liquid nitrogen into superheated porous structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The linear wicking behaviour does not match the classic Lucas-Washburn curve. A linear wicking curve could be observed in Grebenyuk and Dreyer [34]. They investigated the wicking behaviour of liquid nitrogen with a superheated porous structure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The linear wicking behaviour does not match the classic Lucas-Washburn curve. A linear wicking curve could be observed in Grebenyuk and Dreyer [34]. They investigated the wicking behaviour of liquid nitrogen with a superheated porous structure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the buoyancy force and the Wilhelmy effect have to be considered. In order to account for these effects, a correction of the weight measurement was used, which has already been used by Grebenyuk et al [30,34]. For this purpose, the weight of the completely saturated sample, but a partially submerged sample is subtracted from the weight of the completely saturated sample.…”
Section: Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, wicks have been used in the burning of candles or lamps. However, they have also been used in many industrial, medical, and engineering applications 1–12 . In several of these applications, the performance of wicks has been evaluated according to different aspects related to their specific applications 13 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are six influential factors to be considered for cryogenic screen channel LADs: bubble point pressure, flow-through-screen pressure drop, wicking rate, screen compliance, material compatibility, and pressurant gas type (Hartwig 2016). Many studies have been completed on bubble point pressure (Alexander 1970) (Burge 1973) (Camarotti et al 2019a) (Conrath 2012) (Hartwig and McQuillen 2015) ) (Hartwig et al 2015a) (Savas et al 2014) (Hartwig 2015) (Hartwig and Darr 2014) (Hartwig et al 2015b) (Hartwig and Kamotani 2016), flow-through-screen pressure drop (Burge 1973) (Armour 1968) (Camarotti et al 2019a) (Cady 1977) (Cady 1973) (Darr et al 2017) and wicking rate (Hartwig 2016) (Bingham and Tegart 1977) (Camarotti et al 2019a) (Fries et al 2007) (Symons 1974) (Hastings et al 2011) (Grebenyuk 2016) (Gerstmann and Fischer 2013). Only a minimal amount of studies have been completed for the topic of screen compliance (Camarotti et al 2019b) (Jaekle 1997) (Paynter 1973), with no publicly available data on the effects of aspect ratio on screen compliance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%