Wicked Problems in Africa: A Systematic Literature Review

Abstract

The theory of wicked problems, originating from Western academic discussion, has evolved since the 2000s toward a universal diagnostic of societal challenges. In this article, we employ a systematic literature review to investigate the application of the concept of wicked problems in studies focusing on the African context. Our aim is to understand the additional value and limitations of using the concept in a non-Western frame of reference. We conclude that the concept remains underutilized in studies concentrating on Africa; moreover, when it is used, it is mainly by academics of Western or Anglophone origin. Overall, the concept of wicked problems is mainly applied descriptively rather than theoretically. Based on the analysis of the themes and issues characterized as wicked, we elaborate toward a typology that takes account of the concrete “manifestations” (e.g., health issues such as AIDS/HIV and its treatment history) and “mechanisms” (e.g., historical path dependency) that condition the presence of wicked problems in the African context. The article contributes to the theory of wicked problems by developing a typology that distinguishes between interlinked and contextual problems (often characterized through the concept of “dual wickedness”), and proposes that problems can become exacerbated when the two dimensions are simultaneously present.

A Comprehensive Study of Students’ Challenges and Perceptions of Emergency Remote Education During the Early COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Literature Review

“…PRISMA is used to conduct systematic literature reviews (Koehorst et al, 2021;Niskanen et al, 2021;Shen & Lai, 2022). The next step is synthesis analysis, which focuses on the SLR goals and organizes the variable of interests based on the overall features of the articles (Mengist et al, 2020).…”

“…PRISMA is a global initiative created to overcome issues such as the lack of transparent and well-documented review methods in published review articles (Rethlefsen et al, 2021). PRISMA is used to conduct systematic literature reviews (Koehorst et al, 2021; Niskanen et al, 2021; Shen & Lai, 2022). The next step is synthesis analysis, which focuses on the SLR goals and organizes the variable of interests based on the overall features of the articles (Mengist et al, 2020).…”

No More “Solutionism” or “Saviourism” in Futuring African HCI: A Manyfesto

“…Such framing presents design's main project as reimagining the world in ways that make it possible for the social world to act back on its objects and redesign them. This is ontological in the sense that in remaking the things that populate the social world, the politics of design provide the basis for approaching the future of African HCI as a historically dependent wicked predicaments that demands context-specific wicked re-solutions that are both generative and contestable [131] 5 . Although conceiving the future dimension of African HCI identities as an ontological design problem of the coloniality of spaces and time might be new [58], the major issues identified concerning wicked predicaments in the literature related to its conceptual ambiguity and abstraction, its normative approach to solution findings and its lack of analytical utility in providing practical re-solutions [131].…”

“…For example, Niskanen and colleagues conducted a systematic literature review of how wicked problems have been adopted as a descriptive and theoretical frame for diagnosing everyday challenges and opportunities in Africa. This led to the suggestion that such residual concepts become manifested in contemporary discourse because of historical dependencies and contextual inter-relations that are both problematic and productive [131]. On the one hand, such relations are problematic as Western discourses have continuously portrayed inventions related to the descriptors of Africa as pseudo-problems that needed modernistic approaches to staging and analysis.…”