2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2008.06.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wicke–Kallenbach and Graham's diffusion cells: Limits of application for low surface area porous solids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, measurements with these cells require strictly isobaric conditions in cell compartments. Soukup et al [2008] indicated that even a small pressure difference (7–9 Pa) can lead to a significant diffusion flux deviation for samples with pores larger than 7 μm. This can be problematic for geological porous media having pores larger than 7 μm, while it is challenging to achieve a strict isobaric condition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, measurements with these cells require strictly isobaric conditions in cell compartments. Soukup et al [2008] indicated that even a small pressure difference (7–9 Pa) can lead to a significant diffusion flux deviation for samples with pores larger than 7 μm. This can be problematic for geological porous media having pores larger than 7 μm, while it is challenging to achieve a strict isobaric condition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental studies obeyed this relationship for isobaric counterdiffusion (Remick and Geankoplis, 1973;Knaff and Schlünder, 1985). Conversely, pressure change was observed for isovolumetric counterdiffusion (Asaeda et al, 1981;Veldsink et al, 1994;Soukup et al, 2008). Although models have also been proposed to explain these results, they involve Knudsen diffusivity, which depends on molecular weight.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In conventional approaches, the solute concentration (and its spatial gradient) is measured directly by sampling. Examples include but are not limited to methods based on (i) Graham's diffusion tube [141], (ii) Diaphragm cell [5,142,143], (iii) Taylor dispersion/chromatography [6,8,18,[76][77][78][79][80]144] and (iv) the Wicke-Kallenbach cell [145][146][147]. In these approaches, while the direct measurement of composition of gas and/or liquid may provide a spatial gradient of concentration, they may be system intrusive (due to subsequent sampling), as well as time consuming (due to the diffusion being a slow process with diffusion time being large, as large as on the order of weeks to months depending on the system of interest and devices used in the measurements).…”
Section: Measurement Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%