2014
DOI: 10.1080/0952813x.2014.940142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why zombies cannot write significant source code: The Knowledge Game and the art of computer programming

Abstract: Why zombies cannot write significant source code: The Knowledge Game and the art of computer programming Gobbo, F.; Benini, M. General rightsIt is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulationsIf you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, each software abstraction (LoA) is run over a correspondent hardware abstraction (LoO): the history of modern computing shows a continuous drift from hardware to software; in our terms, more LoAs are introduced so to abstract over the hardware, see Gobbo and Benini [12] for details. Moreover, for each pair of LoA/LoO it is possible to identify more than one LoE because c-inforgs are programmable, and at least the programmer's and end-user's views are possible for the same pair LoA/LoO, see Gobbo and Benini [11].…”
Section: The Methods Of Levels Of Abstractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In fact, each software abstraction (LoA) is run over a correspondent hardware abstraction (LoO): the history of modern computing shows a continuous drift from hardware to software; in our terms, more LoAs are introduced so to abstract over the hardware, see Gobbo and Benini [12] for details. Moreover, for each pair of LoA/LoO it is possible to identify more than one LoE because c-inforgs are programmable, and at least the programmer's and end-user's views are possible for the same pair LoA/LoO, see Gobbo and Benini [11].…”
Section: The Methods Of Levels Of Abstractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relation between (P A , P O ) and (S A , S O ) is given by the implementation, which is the encoding of the action 'sorting' of S A into P A . It is the presence of an encoding that justifies to consider the sequence (P A , P O ) , (S A , S O ) as a GoA: encodings are an essential aspect of c-inforgs, as discussed in Gobbo and Benini [10,11].…”
Section: Gradients Of Explanationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation