Proc. 27th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC) 2019
DOI: 10.24928/2019/0121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why Would Location-Based Scheduling Be Applicable for Offshore Wind Turbine Construction?

Abstract: The focus in this research was the conversion of a traditional activity-based construction schedule to a location-based schedule. The case investigated was an offshore wind turbine project in the British sector of the North Sea. This exploratory case study used a deductive approach studying the literature. The initial step was a review of the location-based scheduling literature. The applicability of the theory could be tested through understanding the patterns from existing location-based scheduling literatur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the first lean construction tools was the Last Planner System™ (LPS) (Ballard 2000) which has proven its ability to improve planning effectiveness, e.g., Alarcón et al (2005); AlSehaimi et al (2009); Ballard (2000); Lerche et al (2020a). Later, the lean construction tool Location-Based Scheduling (LBS) emerged (Kenley and Seppänen 2010) and proved its ability to compress construction schedules (Evinger et al 2013;Lerche et al 2019a;Lerche et al 2019b;Seppänen et al 2014). Takt Time Planning (TTP), which is similar to LBS (Seppänen 2014), has also shown its ability to compress schedules (Heinonen and Seppänen 2016;Lerche et al 2020b).…”
Section: Background: Labour Efficiency and Lean In Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the first lean construction tools was the Last Planner System™ (LPS) (Ballard 2000) which has proven its ability to improve planning effectiveness, e.g., Alarcón et al (2005); AlSehaimi et al (2009); Ballard (2000); Lerche et al (2020a). Later, the lean construction tool Location-Based Scheduling (LBS) emerged (Kenley and Seppänen 2010) and proved its ability to compress construction schedules (Evinger et al 2013;Lerche et al 2019a;Lerche et al 2019b;Seppänen et al 2014). Takt Time Planning (TTP), which is similar to LBS (Seppänen 2014), has also shown its ability to compress schedules (Heinonen and Seppänen 2016;Lerche et al 2020b).…”
Section: Background: Labour Efficiency and Lean In Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zegarra and Alarcón (2019) goes in another direction and analyses system behaviours through the lenses of lean management and complexity theories. Process mapping with takt-time planning (Heinonen and Seppänen 2016;Lerche, Neve, Wandah, et al 2020), location-based methods (Kenley andSeppänen 2010;Olivieri et al 2018;Lerche, Seppänen, et al 2019) and the Last Planner System (LPS) (Ballard 2000;Lerche, Neve, Ballard, et al 2020) are other approaches used for production system analysis.…”
Section: Production System Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%