2020
DOI: 10.1002/fsh.10315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why Won't They Listen to Us? Communicating Science in Contentious Situations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scientists who study the public understanding of science have concluded the information deficit model is an insufficient strategy for communication and changing people's views. One alternative strategy for communicating in contentious situations involves making personal connections in ways that permit the participants to listen, share, and connect with others in order to understand the mental model(s) used by others (Crandall et al 2020). The process of dialogue can build understanding of personal values, interests, ideology, worldviews, moral foundations, group identity, and religious background that contribute to disputes.…”
Section: Closing Thoughtsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scientists who study the public understanding of science have concluded the information deficit model is an insufficient strategy for communication and changing people's views. One alternative strategy for communicating in contentious situations involves making personal connections in ways that permit the participants to listen, share, and connect with others in order to understand the mental model(s) used by others (Crandall et al 2020). The process of dialogue can build understanding of personal values, interests, ideology, worldviews, moral foundations, group identity, and religious background that contribute to disputes.…”
Section: Closing Thoughtsmentioning
confidence: 99%