Why Withdrawal? Why Not Withdrawal? Men's Perspectives

Ortaylı, Nuriye; Bulut, Ayşen; Özuğurlu, Metin; Çokar, Muhtar

doi:10.1016/s0968-8080(05)25175-3

Cited by 43 publications

(38 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Although withdrawal is a relatively effective contraceptive method used by millions of heterosexual couples and for HIV risk reduction by men who have sex with men, 3 its value as part of dual protection has rarely received any attention from health professionals. Yet among couples in which the insertive male partner has HIV, avoidance of ejaculation has been reported in North America, Europe and Australia for vaginal, anal and oral sex.…”

Section: Diverse Forms Of Dual Protection For Diverse People and Needsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Dual Protection: More Needed than Practised or Understood

Berer¹

2006

Reproductive Health Matters

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Diverse Forms Of Dual Protection For Diverse People and Needsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In places where barrier methods had been the only means of contraception, condom use fell off steeply and diaphragm production and use all but disappeared. Withdrawal, a form of risk reduction, although still practised by millions of couples, 2,3 was ignored. This paper discusses who needs dual protection and why.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Dual Protection: More Needed than Practised or Understood

Berer¹

2006

Reproductive Health Matters

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Very few men have had vasectomies, for example, except in a handful of countries, as compared to the number of women who have been sterilised when they no longer wish to have more children. On the other hand, although millions of men in countries such as Turkey still practise withdrawal for contraceptive purposes, 1 and gay men began to use withdrawal for risk reduction against HIV transmission early on as well, that practice has received no publicity or promotion, 2 let alone randomised trials to determine its use-effectiveness, so as to promote it if it is proven effective for risk reduction.…”

Section: Marge Berermentioning

confidence: 99%

Male Circumcision for HIV Prevention: Perspectives on Gender and Sexuality

Berer¹

2007

Reproductive Health Matters

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…3,7 The tendency to use these methods has increased because the use of condoms and the withdrawal method have been proven to have no serious side effects, unlike hormonal methods of contraception. 8 A problem that has attracted less attention in these methods is the changes in sexual function and sexual satisfaction after use. 9 Sexual function and satisfaction are the important factors affecting women's health, which are influenced by biological and psychological (i.e., internal and external) factors.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The relationship of male condoms and withdrawal contraceptive methods with female sexual function and satisfaction: a cross sectional study

Tadayon

Honarjoo

Abbaspoor

2016

Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Men's participation is an important issue in family planning and reproductive health. Coitus interruptus and condom use are two reversible and non-hormonal methods of contraception to engage men in family planning. The present study is aimed to evaluate the relationship of male condom use and withdrawal as contraception with female sexual function and satisfaction. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 215 married women aged 15-45 years in Ahvaz. Necessary data were collected using three demographic, female sexual function index (FSFI), and female sexual satisfaction questionnaires. The data were analyzed using SPSS software version 22 and descriptive and analytical tests (independent t-test and Pearson's and Spearman's correlation coefficients) were used. A P level of less than 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Although there was no significant difference in the areas of sexual desire (p=0.31), sexual arousal (p=0.18), vaginal lubrication (p=0.63), and pain (p=0.06) between two groups, but significant differences were found between the areas of orgasm (p=0.004), sexual satisfaction (p=0.009) and overall sexual function index (p=0.04) in both groups, which were higher in the condoms-used group. There was a significant direct relationship between female sexual function index and satisfaction in the condom method (p=0.001, r=0.48) and the withdrawal method (p=0.001, r=0.38). Conclusions: Female sexual function and satisfaction in the users of male condoms is higher than the withdrawal method of contraception, while significant direct relationship was found between female sexual function and satisfaction in both methods. For a more detailed conclusion on female sexual function and satisfaction of users of these methods, longitudinal studies are suggested to be done by performing follow-up periods before, during and after cessation of method.

show abstract

Why Withdrawal? Why Not Withdrawal? Men's Perspectives

Cited by 43 publications

References 12 publications

Dual Protection: More Needed than Practised or Understood

Dual Protection: More Needed than Practised or Understood

Male Circumcision for HIV Prevention: Perspectives on Gender and Sexuality

The relationship of male condoms and withdrawal contraceptive methods with female sexual function and satisfaction: a cross sectional study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About