2011
DOI: 10.3983/twc.2011.0369
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why we should talk about commodifying fan work

Abstract: Fan work's potential role in the cultural economy—in other words, its commodification—is an issue that has received little attention from fans and fan scholars. It is time to consider how we can ensure that commodification of fan work ends up benefiting fans first.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A possible way of counteracting the unethical poaching of fan works and ideas is to monetize fan creations, Brooker (2014), Noppe (2011) and Booth (2010) argue. Such a self-commodification should ideally happen within a hybrid economy, a 'digi-gratis' system in which fans remain in control of their creations and retain the possibility to combine self-commodification with the circulation of gifts, among fans as well as between the market and fans, and vice versa (Booth 2010: 131).…”
Section: Produser Influence or Fannish Thinking?mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A possible way of counteracting the unethical poaching of fan works and ideas is to monetize fan creations, Brooker (2014), Noppe (2011) and Booth (2010) argue. Such a self-commodification should ideally happen within a hybrid economy, a 'digi-gratis' system in which fans remain in control of their creations and retain the possibility to combine self-commodification with the circulation of gifts, among fans as well as between the market and fans, and vice versa (Booth 2010: 131).…”
Section: Produser Influence or Fannish Thinking?mentioning
confidence: 98%