2020
DOI: 10.1177/0141076820947052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why we need an intelligence-led approach to pandemics: supporting science and public health during COVID-19 and beyond

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have previously described the need to transition from traditional public health/biosurveillance to a health security intelligence approach to epi-pandemics. [15][16][17] This also needs to include zoonotic threats through a veterinary intelligence approach.…”
Section: Veterinary Intelligencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We have previously described the need to transition from traditional public health/biosurveillance to a health security intelligence approach to epi-pandemics. [15][16][17] This also needs to include zoonotic threats through a veterinary intelligence approach.…”
Section: Veterinary Intelligencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have previously described the need to transition from traditional public health/biosurveillance to a health security intelligence approach to epi-pandemics. 1517 This also needs to include zoonotic threats through a veterinary intelligence approach. The repeated interface of humans and animals necessitates a focus on generating data and producing actionable intelligence to aid the prevention and early detection of zoonotic spillover events.…”
Section: Veterinary Intelligencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calls for evidence-based decision making have primarily been spearheaded by health experts and agencies with a focus on how to promote evidence-based decision making in the policy process (see, e.g., Brownson et al [6], Oliver and Cairney [7], Salajan et al [8] and Topp et al [9]). There has been less focus on critically addressing the shortcomings of evidencebased decision making during major health crises (the studies by Bensimon and Upshur [10], Greenhalgh and Russell [11], Rosella et al [12] and Bowsher and Sullivan [13] are noticeable exceptions). Evidence-based decision making is here understood broadly as public policymaking using the best available scientific evidence in systematic and transparent processes [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we explicitly link scientific evidence to policymaking rather than to clinical management and care for individual patients. This has also been referred to as science-led policymaking in some pandemic research [1,13]. Publichealth experts or scientific advisers often play prominent roles in such evidence-based policymaking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead science and public health must be supported and integrated into an intelligence-led approach. 3 We also need to be mindful of how other countries have succeeded, and not condemn ourselves to a national silo of maverick policy making. We need help and we need to help others.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%