2004
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.630668
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why VAR Fails: Long Memory and Extreme Events in Financial Markets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0
8

Year Published

2006
2006
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
4
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Such estimation relies on a revised and adjusted version of the classic rescaled range analysis methodology (R/S) first introduced by Hurst (1951), and subsequently enhanced by Wallis (1969a and1969b). Similar to Hurst's results in Geophysics and to financial literature (Malevergne and Sornette, 2006;Los, 2005;Daníelsson and Zigrand, 2005), results confirm that numerous individual risk factors exhibit significant long-term dependence, thus invalidating the square-root-of-time rule. Interestingly, most previous findings related to long-term dependence in financial time-series are still supported, even after the most recent period of market crisis.…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such estimation relies on a revised and adjusted version of the classic rescaled range analysis methodology (R/S) first introduced by Hurst (1951), and subsequently enhanced by Wallis (1969a and1969b). Similar to Hurst's results in Geophysics and to financial literature (Malevergne and Sornette, 2006;Los, 2005;Daníelsson and Zigrand, 2005), results confirm that numerous individual risk factors exhibit significant long-term dependence, thus invalidating the square-root-of-time rule. Interestingly, most previous findings related to long-term dependence in financial time-series are still supported, even after the most recent period of market crisis.…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Despite considering comparative results of both R/S and mR/S as inconclusive, Los (2003) states that evidence documented by Peters (1994) shifts the balance of proof in direction of the existence of the long-term dependence in financial assets' time-series. Peters' (1994) works on long-term dependence in capital markets discarded autoregressive processes (AR), moving average (MA) and autoregressive moving average (ARMA) as sources of the persistence effect or long-term memory that is captured by the R/S, whilst GARCH processes showed a marginal persistence effect.…”
Section: Shortcomings Ofmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Once again, this confirms frequency distributions and their moments failing to capture other type of structures in timeseries, such as serial dependence. This is rather relevant since it is well-documented that focusing on the frequency of returns ignores the importance of their sequence, which could be the main reason why Value at Risk, Expected Shortfall or Extreme Value Theory tend to underestimate risk (Malevergne and Sornette, 2006;Los, 2005;Sornettte, 2003), whilst customary use of GARCH models is insufficient to account for observed volatility. 7 4 degrees of freedom, is unable to account for the dependencies observed in real DJIA data.…”
Section: Source: Authors' Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Respecto de los resultados de ambas metodologías, Los (2003) afirma que la evidencia empírica documentada por Peters (1994) para el caso de series de precios tiende a favorecer las conclusiones de Mandelbrot y Wallis (1969a y 1969b) y Mandelbrot (1972Mandelbrot ( y 1965) -no las de Lo (1991)-sobre la presencia de dependencia de largo plazo, aunque reconoce que todavía es prematuro concluir de manera definitiva sobre el tema.…”
Section: Gráficounclassified