2023
DOI: 10.1002/mds.29322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why Therapeutic Trials Fail in Primary Tauopathies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In many tauopathies considered secondary tauopathies, TAU is the most important co-pathology and may be critical to the developing neurodegeneration, e.g. for AD [ 111 ], which makes a clear distinction in some cases disputable. The genetic factors leading to TAU pathology as well as the pathomechanistic connections between the primary pathology and TAU in secondary tauopathies are often not fully understood.…”
Section: Secondary Tauopathiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many tauopathies considered secondary tauopathies, TAU is the most important co-pathology and may be critical to the developing neurodegeneration, e.g. for AD [ 111 ], which makes a clear distinction in some cases disputable. The genetic factors leading to TAU pathology as well as the pathomechanistic connections between the primary pathology and TAU in secondary tauopathies are often not fully understood.…”
Section: Secondary Tauopathiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early diagnosis is important for clinical care, ensuring individuals can access vital support and benefits, plan for the future, and avoid incorrect diagnosis, inappropriate treatment, and miscommunication of prognosis. It is also a key consideration for advancing the translation of future therapeutic approaches into successful disease‐modifying agents 1 ; enabling individuals with PSP/CBS to be identified early in their disease course while they still meet eligibility criteria, such as independent ambulation, for disease‐modifying clinical trials and before the development of severe neurodegeneration decreases any potential benefit from disease‐modifying agents. Although diagnostic and exclusionary biomarkers may eventually facilitate the diagnostic process, they can only be used once an individual has sought healthcare input and is at least suspected to have a relevant clinical syndrome or specific diagnosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%