2020
DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why the “Visitor Effect” Is Complicated. Unraveling Individual Animal, Visitor Number, and Climatic Influences on Behavior, Space Use and Interactions With Keepers—A Case Study on Captive Hornbills

Abstract: A "visitor effect" on zoo-housed species has been documented since the 1970s, with research focused on mammals (specifically primates). To broaden our understanding of the "visitor effect" in a non-mammal, we conducted a case study on a pair of hornbills, recording behavior and aviary use alongside of visitor and keeper presence. Temperature and humidity were significant predictors of visitor number, and temperature was a better predictor of hornbill exhibit use than visitor presence. Behavior was significantl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
34
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
5
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The visibility levels are not consistent, but they do trend with seasonal fluctuations in golden mantella activity [50]. The return of visitors triggered a decrease in the visibility of golden mantella initially; the increase in September may have been caused of 16 by an environmental influence on their activity levels, and similar situations have been noted in other studies [19].…”
Section: Potential Extraneous Influences On Amphibian Enclosure Usagesupporting
confidence: 47%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The visibility levels are not consistent, but they do trend with seasonal fluctuations in golden mantella activity [50]. The return of visitors triggered a decrease in the visibility of golden mantella initially; the increase in September may have been caused of 16 by an environmental influence on their activity levels, and similar situations have been noted in other studies [19].…”
Section: Potential Extraneous Influences On Amphibian Enclosure Usagesupporting
confidence: 47%
“…An overlooked area of amphibian wellbeing in the zoo is the presence of visitors and their potential effects on behaviour and welfare. Visitor presence has been recorded as influencing enclosure usage in other taxa [18], but any "visitor effect" needs to be measured and evaluated alongside other environmental influences occurring at the same time, e.g., weather conditions [19,20]. Visitor presence may reduce the amount of usable space in the captive environment and consequently reduce the animal's ability to perform a full behavioural repertoire [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As animals in the zoo are exposed to the presence of numerous people on a daily basis, consideration of any related impacts on behaviour should be measured when attempting to infer a welfare state [100]. The visitor effect is highly influenced by other variables (e.g., weather, temperature, pres-ence of animal care staff, season and time of day [32,101,102]), and it is important for these variables to be recorded at the same time as the animal's behaviour to provide context to any potential influence of visitors. Comparative analysis of independent contrasts can also be used to help analyse species differences in behavioural responses [103] by controlling for non-independence caused species' evolutionary relatedness.…”
Section: Applying These Methods and Approaches To Practice: Using Observational Data To Audit Welfarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interaction of visitors with zoo animals and subsequent effects on the animals' behavior, also known as the visitor effect, has been an interest of zoos because of the increasing importance of animal welfare since the 1970s (Hediger, 1970;Rose et al, 2020;. Zoo visitors' behavior near exhibits can directly impact the behavior of the animals within the enclosures in a positive, neutral, or negative manner (Cole & Fraser 2018;Fernandez et al, 2009;Hosey, 2013;Lewis et al, 2020;.…”
Section: ________________________________________________________________________________mentioning
confidence: 99%