2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.06.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why the heart is like an orchestra and the uterus is like a soccer crowd

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In these simulations, mathematical models describe the interactions in heterogeneous populations of active and nonactive cells. By varying the degree of coupling and the composition of the populations, various types of patterns of propagations could be mimicked, ranging from clusters, to local, and to global synchronization (1,32,36,37), including the appearance of ectopic and re-entrant or spiral activities (29). Such models could also explain the various types of local, circular, or major contractions described in this study in the guinea pig uterus and suggest that the structure of the tissue, in concert with the topographical expression of functional gap junctions, can determine the origin and pathway of excitation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these simulations, mathematical models describe the interactions in heterogeneous populations of active and nonactive cells. By varying the degree of coupling and the composition of the populations, various types of patterns of propagations could be mimicked, ranging from clusters, to local, and to global synchronization (1,32,36,37), including the appearance of ectopic and re-entrant or spiral activities (29). Such models could also explain the various types of local, circular, or major contractions described in this study in the guinea pig uterus and suggest that the structure of the tissue, in concert with the topographical expression of functional gap junctions, can determine the origin and pathway of excitation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the end of pregnancy, under the drive from the exponential increase of CRH, E 3 concentrations increase more rapidly than concentrations of E 2 , potentially generating E 3 –ER homodimers capable of activating oestrogen‐responsive genes in the myometrium that promote labour. Such labour‐promoting genes activated by oestrogen include gap junction protein alpha 1 ( GJA1 ), which encodes the gap junction protein connexin‐43 that links adjacent myometrial cells, facilitating the development of co‐ordinated contractions (Smith, Imtiaz, Banney, Paul, & Young, ). Oestrogen may also inhibit expression of genes that encode potassium channels (Parkington et al., ), increasing myometrial cell excitability (Tong, Tribe, Smith, & Taggart, ), in addition to affecting expression of progesterone receptor (PR) isoforms (Mesiano et al., ).…”
Section: Corticotrophin‐releasing Hormonementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The unliganded PR‐A then dimerises and translocates to the nucleus, where it interacts with jun/fos heterodimers and promotes GJA1 transcription to produce connexin‐43 and promote labour (Nadeem, Shynlova, Mesiano, & Lye, ). There is also evidence that the unliganded PR‐A isoform is able to promote translation of connexin‐43 and movement of the connexin protein to the surface of myocytes to facilitate formation of connexin junctions with neighbouring cells, facilitating the development of the synchronised contractile behaviour required to increase intrauterine pressure (Smith et al., ). The myometrium therefore tips from a relaxed to a contractile phenotype though a change in PR isoforms.…”
Section: Progesteronementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We appreciate the letter of Dr Andersen, and we wholeheartedly acknowledge the contributions of Mel Barclay for not only his scientific work but also as the true humanist he was. However, there are important differences between the physiological assumptions of organ-level contractility that we used and those used by Andersen and Barclay in 1995 1 and Barclay, Andersen, and Simon in 2010. 2 In both papers, the authors assumed the presence of a small number of functional pacemakers (perhaps only one, though) and that the only means of recruiting new tissue into each contraction is through direct cell-to-cell signaling as the action potential passes through tissue.…”
Section: Replymentioning
confidence: 99%