2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2015.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why the activity of a gene depends on its neighbors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
56
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
(100 reference statements)
12
56
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The greater than twofold increase in transcription from a tandem duplicate could arise from aspects of various known regulatory mechanisms. Some of the possibilities we can envision include the following: (i) more frequent rebinding of transcription factors because the local concentration of binding sites is higher in tandemly arranged duplicates (18); (ii) more efficient looping of DNA due to clusters of transcription factors binding to identical sites on both gene copies (18); or (iii) more effective remodeling of chromatin to a favorable state for transcription (19). Any of these mechanisms could be enhanced or attenuated by neighboring sequences (i.e., by classical position effects), which could account for the observed dependence of the degree of overactivity on chromosomal position.…”
Section: The Biological Significance and Potential Mechanisms Underlyingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The greater than twofold increase in transcription from a tandem duplicate could arise from aspects of various known regulatory mechanisms. Some of the possibilities we can envision include the following: (i) more frequent rebinding of transcription factors because the local concentration of binding sites is higher in tandemly arranged duplicates (18); (ii) more efficient looping of DNA due to clusters of transcription factors binding to identical sites on both gene copies (18); or (iii) more effective remodeling of chromatin to a favorable state for transcription (19). Any of these mechanisms could be enhanced or attenuated by neighboring sequences (i.e., by classical position effects), which could account for the observed dependence of the degree of overactivity on chromosomal position.…”
Section: The Biological Significance and Potential Mechanisms Underlyingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result of TSS-Seq, OC-Seq, and other epigenetic studies in animals, a new paradigm for understanding the structure of promoter regions is starting to emerge in the literature which posits that the classical binary division into core versus distal promoter regions is an oversimplification that no longer aligns well with the totality of current findings, particularly in vertebrates (reviewed in Andersson, 2015;Feuerborn and Cook, 2015;Kim and Shiekhattar, 2015). In particular, it is clear that the presence of one or more previously labeled CPEs within a promoter is not an absolute requirement in order to achieve basal transcription (Kim and Shiekhattar, 2015) and that the structure of regions that function as a "promoter" and the structure of regions that function as an "enhancer" is essentially identical for many human and mouse loci.…”
Section: The State Of the Core: Our Limited Knowledge Of Pol II Core mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clustering around the strongest enhancers would allow a large number of genes to benefit the increase in expression. Finally, in the third scenario, the transcription of a gene directly stimulates its neighbors (Feuerborn et al 2015). Clustering would then directly increase transcription at a local scale.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%