“…Common reasons for being categorised as moderate or high risk of bias were providing the data in an unadjusted model or only presenting descriptive statistics (93·5%, 29/31) The 30 studies included in the meta-analysis were subject to sensitivity analyses. High (7), 22,24,26,36,46,48,50 moderate (16), 18,20,21,25,28–30,34,38,40,42–44,51,53,54 and low (7) 19,23,33,37,39,47,49 ROB studies were treated as individual subgroups and the pooled effect size of current infection status against PPF was reanalysed (Table 3). The low ROB studies showed no association of current schistosome infection status with PPF (2 · 71, 95% CI:0·98-7·48) with a significant association in the moderate ROB subgroup (OR 1 · 92, 95% CI: 1 · 34-2 · 76) and the strongest association in high ROB subgroup (OR 5 · 53, 95% CI: 1 · 71-17 · 87).…”