2020
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-100387/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why reducing the cosmic sound horizon can not fully resolve the Hubble tension

Abstract: The mismatch between the locally measured expansion rate of the universe and the one inferred from the cosmic microwave background measurements by Planck in the context of the standard ΛCDM, known as the Hubble tension, has become one of the most pressing problems in cosmology. A large number of amendments to the ΛCDM model have been proposed in order to solve this tension. Many of them introduce new physics, such as early dark energy, modifications of the standard model neutrino sector, extra radiation, primo… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this is accompanied by a comparable S 8 ¼ 0.833 þ0.016 −0.022 for EMG with ξ ¼ −1=6 and a smaller S 8 ¼ 0.822 AE 0.011 for ξ ¼ −1=6, λ ¼ 0, since H 0 is smaller and therefore the shift in the value of ω c necessary to restore the fit with CMB data is slightly smaller as well. This is again in line with the observation that models that lead to a larger H 0 modifying the sound horizon inevitably lead to a larger ω c and therefore S 8 [135].…”
Section: The ξ = − 1=6 Casesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…However, this is accompanied by a comparable S 8 ¼ 0.833 þ0.016 −0.022 for EMG with ξ ¼ −1=6 and a smaller S 8 ¼ 0.822 AE 0.011 for ξ ¼ −1=6, λ ¼ 0, since H 0 is smaller and therefore the shift in the value of ω c necessary to restore the fit with CMB data is slightly smaller as well. This is again in line with the observation that models that lead to a larger H 0 modifying the sound horizon inevitably lead to a larger ω c and therefore S 8 [135].…”
Section: The ξ = − 1=6 Casesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…It should be stressed that we have not specified a redshift where the EoS differs from flat ΛCDM, and it is conceivable that some variation in the early Universe is required, as argued in [63][64][65], for example [66][67][68][69][70] (see [71][72][73][74][75][76][77] for related discussion). Given probes of the pre-CMB Universe are limited, this may preclude us from observing a running in H 0 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, an actual analysis could potentially reveal the preference of higher neutrino masses which will yield a smaller value of S 8 as relevant for weak lensing measurements of this parameter, see e.g. [139].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%