Why quantum mechanics is incompatible with Einstein locality

Selleri, F.; Tarozzi, Gino

doi:10.1016/0375-9601(86)90423-8

Cited by 10 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…There exist papers (e.g.,Jung 2017;Wiseman 2006;Treacy 2003; Howard 1975;Selleri, Tarozzi 1986;Garuccio, Selleri 1980;Schiavulli, Selleri 1979;Selleri 1978) considering Einstein's concept of locality, but only as a physical one rather than interpreting it ontomathematically (as in the present paper). Rather Einstein's geometrization of electromagnetic field (e.g., Giovanelli 2016) then developed into the proper geometric theory of gravitation in general relativity is closer ant thus more relevant.Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4593958…”

mentioning

confidence: 82%

Logic, mathematics, physics: from a loose thread to the close link: Or what gravity is for both logic and mathematics rather than only for physics

Penchev

2023

SSRN Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

mentioning

confidence: 82%

Logic, mathematics, physics: from a loose thread to the close link: Or what gravity is for both logic and mathematics rather than only for physics

Penchev

2023

SSRN Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…However, the historical lesson consisting in the relation of the approaches of Lobachevsky and Riemann to the construction of non-Euclidean geometries allows for the research of the origin to be returned still a step back, to logic, rather than from physics only to mathematics. The crucial assistance for the possibility of that next step back, in the origin of the universe and even that of the being at all is suggested by Riemann's idea for the parameter of space curvature to be introduced to the manifold of all non-Euclidean geometries, after which even Euclidean geometry 3 There exist papers (e.g., Jung 2017;Wiseman 2006;Treacy 2003;Howard 1975;Selleri, Tarozzi 1986;Garuccio, Selleri 1980;Schiavulli, Selleri 1979;Selleri 1978) considering Einstein's concept of locality, but only as a physical one rather than interpreting it ontomathematically (as in the present paper). Rather Einstein's geometrization of electromagnetic field (e.g., Giovanelli 2016) then developed into the proper geometric theory of gravitation in general relativity is closer ant thus more relevant.…”

Section: Riemann's Approachmentioning

confidence: 99%

Logic, mathematics, physics: from a loose thread to the close link. Or what gravity is for both logic and mathematics rather than only for physics

Penchev

2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Gravitation is interpreted to be an “ontomathematical” force or interaction rather than an only physical one. That approach restores Newton’s original design of universal gravitation in the framework of “The Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy”, which allows for Einstein’s special and general relativity to be also reinterpreted ontomathematically. The entanglement theory of quantum gravitation is inherently involved also ontomathematically by virtue of the consideration of the qubit Hilbert space after entanglement as the Fourier counterpart of pseudo-Riemannian space. Gravitation can be also interpreted as purely mathematical or logical “force” or “interaction” as a corollary from its ontomathematical (rather than physical) realization. The ontomathematical approach to gravitation is implicit in general relativity equating it to operators in pseudo-Riemannian space obeying the Einstein field equation and also well-known by the “geometrization of physics”. Quantum mechanics shares the same by the separable complex Hilbert space and defining “physical quantity” by the Hermitian operators.

show abstract

“…Indeed, any quantum entity considered to be a single system and accordingly described by a single separable complex Hilbert space obeys Pauli's 9 The paper of Simonov, Capolupo, Giampaolo (2019) investigates the violation of CPT-symmetry in the same context. 10 For example, the note of Selleri and Tarozzi (1986) synthesizes why quantum mechanics is incompatible with Einstein locality. constitution absolutely.…”

Section: Introduction: the History Of Nobel Prizes In Physics Especia...mentioning

confidence: 99%

The 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics for Entanglement and Quantum Information: The New Revolution in Quantum Mechanics and Science

Пенчев¹

2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The paper discusses the 2022 Nobel Prize in physics for experiments of entanglement “establishing the violation of Bell inequalities and pioneering quantum information science” in a much wider, including philosophical context legitimizing by the authority of the Nobel Prize a new scientific area out of “classical” quantum mechanics relevant to Pauli’s “particle” paradigm of energy conservation and thus to the Standard model obeying it. One justifies the eventual future theory of quantum gravitation as belonging to the newly established quantum information science. Entanglement, involving non-Hermitian operators for its rigorous description, non-unitarity as well as nonlocal and superluminal physical signals “spookily” (by Einstein’s flowery epithet) synchronizing and transferring some nonzero action at a distance, can be considered to be quantum gravity so that its local counterpart to be Einstein’s gravitation according to general relativity therefore pioneering an alternative pathway to quantum gravitation different from the “secondary quantization” of the Standard model. So, the experiments of entanglement once they have been awarded by the Nobel Prize launch particularly the relevant theory of quantum gravitation grounded on “quantum information science” thus granted to be nonclassical quantum mechanics in the shared framework of the generalized quantum mechanics obeying rather quantum-information conservation than only energy conservation. The concept of “dark phase” of the universe naturally linked to the very well confirmed “dark matter” and “dark energy” and opposed to its “light phase” inherent to classical quantum mechanics and the Standard model obeys quantum-information conservation, after which reversible causality or the mutual transformation of energy and information are valid. The mythical Big Bang after which energy conservation holds universally is to be replaced by an omnipresent and omnitemporal medium of decoherence of the dark and nonlocal phase into the light and local phase. The former is only an integral image of the latter and borrowed in fact rather from religion than from science. Physical, methodological and proper philosophical conclusions follow from that paradigm shift heralded by the 2022 Nobel Prize in physics. For example, the scientific theory of thinking should originate from the dark phase of the universe, as well: probably only approximately modeled by neural networks physically belonging to the light phase thoroughly. A few crucial philosophical sequences follow from the break of Pauli’s paradigm: (1) the establishment of the “dark” phase of the universe as opposed to its “light” phase, only to which the Cartesian dichotomy of “body” and “mind” is valid; (2) quantum information conservation as relevant to the dark phase, furthermore generalizing energy conservation as to its light phase, productively allowing for physical entities to appear “ex nihilo”, i.e., from the dark phase, in which energy and time are yet inseparable from each other; (3) reversible causality as inherent to the dark phase; (4) the interpretation of gravitation only mathematically: as an interpretation of the incompleteness of finiteness to infinity, for example, following the Gödel dichotomy (“either contradiction or incompleteness”) about the relation of arithmetic to set theory; (5) the restriction of the concept of hierarchy only to the light phase; (6) the commensurability of both physical extremes of a quantum and the universe as a whole in the dark phase obeying quantum information conservation and akin to Nicholas of Cusa’s philosophical and theological worldview.

show abstract

Why quantum mechanics is incompatible with Einstein locality

Cited by 10 publications

References 13 publications

Logic, mathematics, physics: from a loose thread to the close link: Or what gravity is for both logic and mathematics rather than only for physics

Logic, mathematics, physics: from a loose thread to the close link: Or what gravity is for both logic and mathematics rather than only for physics

Logic, mathematics, physics: from a loose thread to the close link. Or what gravity is for both logic and mathematics rather than only for physics

The 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics for Entanglement and Quantum Information: The New Revolution in Quantum Mechanics and Science

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About