Evolutionary Biology 2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-00952-5_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why Phylogenetic Trees are Often Quite Robust Against Lateral Transfers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8,27 Note that this last result can be extended to transfers between nodes that are consecutive once the descendant nodes are removed. Figure 1 shows a possible representation of a lateral transfer: the transfer is given by an arrow between taxa on a tree.…”
Section: Lateral Transfersmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8,27 Note that this last result can be extended to transfers between nodes that are consecutive once the descendant nodes are removed. Figure 1 shows a possible representation of a lateral transfer: the transfer is given by an arrow between taxa on a tree.…”
Section: Lateral Transfersmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…If lateral transfers occur only between consecutive taxa in such an order, it can be shown that, within the usual distance-based framework for constructing phylogenetic trees, the tree reconstructed by applying the Neighbor-Joining algorithm 7 furnishes a perfect circular order of the nodes. 8 In particular, the order of the taxa corresponds to one of the possible orders of the taxa coming from the tree prior to lateral transfers. This result may help explain why phylogenies obtained from molecular data often furnish reasonable trees despite lateral transfers: as there are many possible orders associated with a tree, a large number of lateral transfers can be perfectly accommodated by a tree.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, the main results that are used in the following sections are presented succinctly, since they have been published elsewhere. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] New results are presented in the subsequent section "A common framework for character-and distance-based phylogenies" as well as in Annexes 2 and 3. Annex 1 is a reformulation of known results that is necessary to understand Annex 2.…”
Section: Phylogenetic Trees and Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If lateral transfers are only between consecutive end nodes, the tree reconstructed with the Neighbor-Joining algorithm furnishes a circular order of the nodes. 4,5 The order of the nodes corresponds to one of the possible orders of the tree prior to lateral transfers. By using the degrees of freedom on the order of the taxa in a tree, a large number of lateral transfers can be accommodated by a tree while preserving the circular order.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An adequate method is necessary to quantify to what extent the distance matrix corresponds to a split network or a tree. The Minimum Contradiction method can be used for that purpose 1012…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%