Why People Don’t Take their Concerns about Fair Trade to the Supermarket: The Role of Neutralisation

Abstract

This article explores how neutralisation can explain people’s lack of commitment to buying Fair Trade (FT) products, even when they identify FT as an ethical concern. It examines the theoretical tenets of neutralisation theory and critically assesses its applicability to the purchase of FT products. Exploratory research provides illustrative examples of neutralisation techniques being used in the FT consumer context. A conceptual framework and research propositions delineate the role of neutralisation in explaining the attitude-behaviour discrepancies evident in relation to consumers’ FT purchase behaviour, providing direction for further research that will generate new knowledge of consumers’ FT purchase behaviour and other aspects of ethical consumer behaviour. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007attitude-behaviour gap, ethical consumerism, ethical decision-making, fair trade purchase, neutralisation,

Fostering Responsible Communities: A Community Social Marketing Approach to Sustainable Living

“…Caruana (2007) argues that the emphasis on positivist perspectives across the green and ethical consumption literature has led to a bias toward research examining the cognitive aspects of individual behavior and behavioral change (Chatzidakis et al, 2007;Shaw, 2005;Shaw and Clarke, 1999;Shaw and Shiu, 2003;Shaw et al, 2000;Sparks and Shepherd, 1992;Ajzen, 1991;Bagozzi, 1993;Bagozzi and Warshaw, 1990). However, such theories pay scant attention to habits or the social processes, contexts, and incentive structures that embed behavior.…”

“…Researchers adopting qualitative methodologies (e.g. Chatzidakis et al, 2007;Chatzidakis et al, 2004;McDonald et al, 2006;McEachern et al, 2007;Newholm, 2005) have also theorized such attitude-behavior discrepancies at the level of individual agency within the context of ethical and green consumption, and while acknowledging the potential influences of peer pressure, social norms and habits, McDonald et al (2006) note that a deeper discussion on the role of such constructs is neglected in their study.…”

Bags for Life: The Embedding of Ethical Consumerism

“…Specifically they have looked for causes and impediments that may prevent the translation of intention into action. Chatzidakis et al (2007) explored the justifications used by consumers to explain the discrepancy between their attitude and behaviour, categorizing them on the basis of Strutton et al's (1994) classification of rationalisations of norm-violating behaviour (known as neutralisation techniques).…”

“…This would suggest that the use of 'bags for life' in the period 2009 -2012 had not become sufficiently embedded and integrated behaviour (May and Finch, 2009) Increasing social concern about the environment is reflected in the growth in consumers' interest in ethical consumption (Newholm and Shaw, 2007;The Co-operative Group, 2012). Despite this, authors (Auger and Devinney, 2007;Bray et al, 2011;Carrigan and Attala, 2001;Carrington et al, 2010;Chatzidakis et al, 2007;Cowe and Williams, 2000;d'Astous and Legendre, 2009;Papaoikonomou et al, 2012) point to an attitude-behaviour gap where although people may express a positive attitude toward being ethical or socially responsible in their consumption, they do not always act on that attitude. This paper uses a variety of case study data and participant surveys to consider whether a switch to 'bags for life' has embedded since the report on carrier bag usage to WRAP in 2005 (Andrew Irving Associates, 2005).…”

Can the Fair Trade Movement Enrich Traditional Business Ethics? An Historical Study of Its Founders in Mexico

“…According to Nobel Prize winning economist Joseph Stiglitz, the greatest challenge to FT lies not in institutions but in people's minds (Stiglitz, 2002;Stiglitz and Charlton, 2006). In the same vein, other authors, such as Chatzikadis et al (2007) consider that the FT movement is mostly dependent on psychology, in that it results from individuals making the choice to participate in the responsible consumption movement. For these authors, consumption, as the ultimate stage of the economic process, plays a vital role in determining ethical choices throughout the system (Davies and Crane, 2003;Mance, 2005;Nicholls and Opal, 2005).…”