2017
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3054480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why People Born During World War II are Healthier

Abstract: During wars, countless people suffer, even during times without direct exposure to violence, as they are exposed to conditions such as poorer nutritional situations, stress, recessions, and sub optimally functioning health care systems. This was the situation during much of World War II in three occupied countries: France, Belgium and The Netherlands. Biological theory predicts that the health of those who were prenatally exposed to such adverse circumstances will be worse once they have reached old age. But f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A significant contribution of the current study is also to show that the proportion of women reporting ‘no difficulty’ in IADL was highest in the war cohort rather than in baby boomers. Although this result may seem counterintuitive, it is in line with those of a recent study on the association between prenatal exposure to the Second World War and health at the ages of 50–70 years 31. Using data from the SHARE, the authors reported no substantial negative effect of war exposure, and even a better health among exposed women.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…A significant contribution of the current study is also to show that the proportion of women reporting ‘no difficulty’ in IADL was highest in the war cohort rather than in baby boomers. Although this result may seem counterintuitive, it is in line with those of a recent study on the association between prenatal exposure to the Second World War and health at the ages of 50–70 years 31. Using data from the SHARE, the authors reported no substantial negative effect of war exposure, and even a better health among exposed women.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…3 However, findings from these quasi-experimental studies are not uniform, as a few studies reported no significant association between early health shocks and adult outcomes (e.g., Stanner et al 1997;and Kannisto et al 1997;Lumey et al 2011;Brown and Thomas 2013). Similarly, van Ewijk and Lindeboom (2017) found largely null effects for prenatal cohorts exposed to the adverse effects of World War II in France, Belgium, and the Netherlands.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This favorable trend may result from differential influences of the Second World War on aging cohorts born before, during, or at the end of the war (22). Whereas prenatal exposure to the war does not seem linked with poorer health in older age (36), adverse events experienced during childhood have broad effects on neural, endocrine, immune, and metabolic physiology in later life (37), and have been linked with increased telomere length, a marker of cellular senescence (38).…”
Section: Physical Performance Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%