2020
DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2020.589965
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why Ordinal Variables Can (Almost) Always Be Treated as Continuous Variables: Clarifying Assumptions of Robust Continuous and Ordinal Factor Analysis Estimation Methods

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
91
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 189 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
0
91
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Predictors age and TIA were both categorical questions with ranges in the survey, and converted to continuous predictor variables preserving the ordinal ranks [ 49 ] where age groups and TIA categories were labelled in sequence from lowest to highest (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5). While the categories for age and TIA may not have perfectly equal spacing, Pasta [ 50 ] and Robitzsch [ 49 ] specify that they can be treated as continuous in almost all cases, even when spacing is not equal across categories. This was done to assess for a trend in the predictor variables age, gender, and TIA for each of the outcome variables.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Predictors age and TIA were both categorical questions with ranges in the survey, and converted to continuous predictor variables preserving the ordinal ranks [ 49 ] where age groups and TIA categories were labelled in sequence from lowest to highest (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5). While the categories for age and TIA may not have perfectly equal spacing, Pasta [ 50 ] and Robitzsch [ 49 ] specify that they can be treated as continuous in almost all cases, even when spacing is not equal across categories. This was done to assess for a trend in the predictor variables age, gender, and TIA for each of the outcome variables.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bivariate normality of pairs of LRVs can be tested against observed ordinal data when at least one of the variables has ≥3 categories [66], but there are no nonnormality corrections for normal-theory estimators that could accommodate nonnormal LRVs, as there are for nonnormal observed indicators [67]. Arguably, assuming continuity of ordinal data rather than assuming their LRVs are normal simply trades off one tenuous assumption for another [68], and the latter can have less predictable consequences.…”
Section: Future Directions For Discrete Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, it should be mentioned that the analyses were performed on the basis that ordinal variables can be treated as numerical variables. While there are some arguments in favor of exclusively considering these variables as categorical, there is also a strong line supporting dealing with ordinal variables as continuous, according to Robitz [52].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%