2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2102.04409
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why nuclear forces favor the highest weight irreducible representations of the fermionic SU(3) symmetry

Andriana Martinou,
Dennis Bonatsos,
K. E. Karakatsanis
et al.

Abstract: The consequences of the attractive, shortrange nucleon-nucleon (NN) interaction on the wave functions of the Elliott SU(3) and the proxy-SU(3) symmetry are discussed. The NN interaction favors the most symmetric spatial SU(3) irreducible representation, which corresponds to the maximal spatial overlap among the fermions. The percentage of the symmetric components out of the total in an SU(3) wave function is introduced, through which it is found, that no SU(3) irrep is more symmetric than the highest weight ir… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 63 publications
(174 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of asymptotic quantum numbers for deformed nuclei is just an example of choosing a basis as close as possible to the dynamics of the physical system under study [32,33]. It should be noted that the Nilsson model is still in wide use, 65 years after its introduction [11], either in the framework of Nilsson mean-field plus pairing calculations [34,35], cranking shell model calculations based on the Nilsson potential with pairing correlations [36], or in relation to approximate SU(3) symmetries [37] like the pseudo-SU(3) symmetry [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47], the quasi-SU(3) symmetry [48,49], the proxy-SU(3) symmetry [50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57], and the recovery of SU(3) symmetry at superdeformation [58].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of asymptotic quantum numbers for deformed nuclei is just an example of choosing a basis as close as possible to the dynamics of the physical system under study [32,33]. It should be noted that the Nilsson model is still in wide use, 65 years after its introduction [11], either in the framework of Nilsson mean-field plus pairing calculations [34,35], cranking shell model calculations based on the Nilsson potential with pairing correlations [36], or in relation to approximate SU(3) symmetries [37] like the pseudo-SU(3) symmetry [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47], the quasi-SU(3) symmetry [48,49], the proxy-SU(3) symmetry [50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57], and the recovery of SU(3) symmetry at superdeformation [58].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%