2013
DOI: 10.1177/186810341303200304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why Not Genocide? Anti-Chinese Violence in Aceh, 1965–1966

Abstract: This article provides an account of anti-Chinese violence in Aceh between 1 October 1965 and 17 August 1966. Drawing upon original oral history evidence and previously unknown documentary sources, this article builds upon current scholarly understandings that two phases of violence involving members of the ethnic Chinese community can be identified in Aceh during this period, to explain how a third explicitly ethnic-based phase of violence directed against members of the ethnic Chinese community in Aceh can al… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, further research into intergroup attribution bias within other non-WEIRD contexts is needed, particularly in contexts where there is a history of conflict. In our study, where there is history of discrimination and conflict between Pribumi and Chinese Indonesians (Melvin, 2013;Tan, 2008), we hypothesized that if a participant were Chinese Indonesian (belonging to the victim group), s/he may attribute the causes of the mass violence during the riots to the internal factors of perpetrators. On the other hand, if a participant were Pribumi Indonesian (belonging to the group involved in perpetrating the violence) s/he may attribute the causes of the violence to external factors.…”
Section: The Ultimate Attribution Error In Intergroup Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, further research into intergroup attribution bias within other non-WEIRD contexts is needed, particularly in contexts where there is a history of conflict. In our study, where there is history of discrimination and conflict between Pribumi and Chinese Indonesians (Melvin, 2013;Tan, 2008), we hypothesized that if a participant were Chinese Indonesian (belonging to the victim group), s/he may attribute the causes of the mass violence during the riots to the internal factors of perpetrators. On the other hand, if a participant were Pribumi Indonesian (belonging to the group involved in perpetrating the violence) s/he may attribute the causes of the violence to external factors.…”
Section: The Ultimate Attribution Error In Intergroup Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Province of the Special Territory of Aceh. ' The sign is a silent reminder of the slaughter of half a million people across the Indonesian archipelago, escalating from the initial killings in Aceh in October 1965 and leading to the flight of thousands of people to Medan, a violence-led migration pattern (Tsai and Kammen 2012;Melvin 2013).…”
Section: The Long Journey From 1976 To 2016mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dalam hal ini, hubungan antara etnis Aceh sebagai mayoritas dan Tionghoa sebagai minoritas memiliki rekam jejak buruk. Melvin (2013) (Kusuma & Sholihah, 2018).…”
Section: Pengantarunclassified