Why medical tourists choose Turkey as a medical tourism destination?

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to determine the relationships between the health tourists’ perceptions on decisive factors (i.e. experience, technological infrastructure, flight distance, legal and moral restrictions, touristic attractions, religious similarity, waiting time and price of health tourism) and Turkey as their choice of healthcare tourism destination. Design/methodology/approach The data for this empirical study were collected from 288 patients in Turkey, all of whom being health tourists from various countries. Descriptive statistics and Kruskal–Wallis difference tests were utilized for analyses. Findings Statistically significant differences were found among health tourists in regards to the geographical regions of their residence. These finding suggest that differences among health tourists in regards to the geographical regions of their residence contributed to the healthcare tourists’ behaviors and health tourism market segmentations in Turkey. Research limitations/implications Among the constraints of the study are the time and funding limitations coupled with the limitations on the scale development attempts in the health tourism literature and limitation and biases related to primary data collection. Despite all these limitations, by being the first study exploring the health tourism market segmentations in Turkey, this study contributes to the literature about the perceptions of health tourists and their reasons in choosing Turkey as a health tourism destination. Practical implications Determining the Turkey’s health tourism market segmentations will generate the positive effect on the target market which is currently heterogeneous for health tourism operators and intermediary institutions. Moreover, this knowledge would allow the target market to be divided into homogeneous groups, with different marketing mixes for each group. Homogenized groups exhibit unified purchasing behaviors for their needs. Therefore, it is very important for health tourism operators and intermediary institutions to know how the preferences of health tourists from different geographical regions vary. Originality/value The paper fulfills a need for advancing the knowledge on the decisive factors in determining Turkey as the health tourism destination by revealing perceptions of health tourists from various geographical regions. This information is very valuable for the Turkey’s healthcare tourism marketing managers who desire to implement the strategies to achieve competitive advantage in the global health tourism market.

Exploring visit intention to India for medical tourism using an extended theory of planned behaviour

“…Like other forms of tourism, deciding a destination country for medical tourism is a complex process. Past studies on cultural tourism have emphasized on elements like perceived risk, facilitating condition and attitude as determinants of their visit intention towards a destination country (Sag and Zengul, 2018; Seow et al , 2017). In the context of tourism, visit intention represents a psychological state that emerges from the evaluative belief, subjective norms and certain other situational elements that evolve during the initiation of travel planning (Moutinho, 1987).…”

Evaluating the Antecedents of Health Destination Loyalty: The Moderating Role of Destination Trust and Tourists’ Emotions

“…In 2018, it [Malaysia] welcomed 1.2 million health tourists and generated $362 million in revenue (Thomas, 2019). However, Turkey stands out as a leading destination in terms of revenue generated; it received $10 billion in foreign exchange from an estimated 1 million health tourists in 2017 (Sag & Zengul, 2019).…”

Exploring the effects of “excessive tourism growth” on public health and ecosystem

“…Important for the sustainability of tourism 16.6 Precautions are important for the issues that affect public health negatively 11.1 Healthy food, hygienic environment and sanitation should be provided 8.3 Organizations have the ambition to make money, health is at the second place 8.3 If there is no attention, environmental pollution will increase 5.5 If there is no attention, contagious diseases can spread 5.5 Running short of resources 5.5 The health of not only local people but also tourists should be paid attention 5.5 There has to be a balance between profits of capital owners and job done in society 5.5 There have to be public benefits instead of individual benefits 2.7 Tourism organizations should not evolve just to satisfy tourism, stay natural 2.7 There is a possibility to become a victim of wild capitalism 2.7 Protection of the country's prestige is indispensable 2.7 The attractiveness of the country is important 2.7 If nutrition and sheltering are bad, the health breaks down 2.7 Important for general prosperity 2.7 Mobility is essential 2.7 The current organizations, besides marketing tools, start to pay attention to societal benefits 2.7 Considering the carrying capacity of the region is important. Economic, social and cultural activities and the environment will affect the societal health 2.7 revisiting intentions (Sag and Zengul, 2019), which will influence the carrying capacity and the resources of the health field.…”