2021
DOI: 10.51753/flsrt.1027595
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why lncRNAs were not conserved? Is it for adaptation?

Abstract: Plants are sessile organisms affected by changing environment, especially biotic and abiotic stress. Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) became prominent as crucial regulators in diverse biological mechanisms, including developmental processes and stress responses such as salinity. In this study, salinity related lncRNAs were sequenced and analyzed according to homology based on rice and maize lncRNA sequences. After sequencing, 72HASATROOT and 72TARMROOT were identified as 568 bp, additionally, 72HASATSHOOT and 72… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
(89 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, 7970 among 19,908 lncRNAs have been annotated by CANTATAdb [15,16]. Annotation and sequencing studies revealed that CNT0018772 had two exon and one intron, while sequencing data of cDNA did not contain any intron part, indicating that this lncRNA may undergo the excision of introns or alternative splicing [17]. According to our previous studies, expression analysis of CNT0018772 and CNT0031477 demonstrated that these two lncRNAs were affected by salt stress.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…To date, 7970 among 19,908 lncRNAs have been annotated by CANTATAdb [15,16]. Annotation and sequencing studies revealed that CNT0018772 had two exon and one intron, while sequencing data of cDNA did not contain any intron part, indicating that this lncRNA may undergo the excision of introns or alternative splicing [17]. According to our previous studies, expression analysis of CNT0018772 and CNT0031477 demonstrated that these two lncRNAs were affected by salt stress.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The multi-exon homologs were probed for intron-exon size variation and such pairs were selected for identification of splice site and SRP protein site mutations (Kharabian, 2010;Karlik, 2021) through ESEfinder2.0 (http://krainer01.cshl.edu/tools/ ESE2/). The cut-off for splice donor and splice acceptor sites was kept at 6.9 and for branch site was 2.0.…”
Section: Alternative Splicing and Proteinprotein Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%