1998
DOI: 10.1017/s004388710000811x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why Liberal States Accept Unwanted Immigration

Abstract: This article explores why liberal states accept unwanted immigration, discussing the cases of illegal immigration in the United States and family immigration in Europe. Rejecting the diagnosis of state sovereignty undermined by globalization, the author argues that self-limited sovereignty explains why states accept unwanted immigration. One aspect of self-limited sovereignty is a political process under the sway of interest-group politics (“client politics,” as Gary Freeman says). The logic of client politics… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
293
0
6

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 531 publications
(311 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
293
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…8 Restrictive immigration policies are often characterized by loopholes, that leave room for potential migrants to take advantage of economic incentives. For example, immigration to Western European countries still took place after the late Seventies, despite the official closed-door policy (Joppke 1998). Family-reunification and asylum-seekers policies can explain continuing migration inflows to Western Europe.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 Restrictive immigration policies are often characterized by loopholes, that leave room for potential migrants to take advantage of economic incentives. For example, immigration to Western European countries still took place after the late Seventies, despite the official closed-door policy (Joppke 1998). Family-reunification and asylum-seekers policies can explain continuing migration inflows to Western Europe.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Policy makers see family migration often as unwanted migration (Joppke 1998), and thus this type of migration has started to become subject to increased restrictions. Family migrants tend to feature in political debates as a group that is difficult to integrate into the job market (Kofman et al 2013).…”
Section: ! 3!mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What drives the formation of these policies in the first place? In this section we review the explanations that have been proposed in the economics literature, while referring the interested reader to the insightful papers by, Espenshade and Colahun (1993), Joppke (1998), Berg (2009) and Ceobanu and Escandell (2010) for perspectives from other social sciences.…”
Section: The Political Economy Of Illegal Immigrationmentioning
confidence: 99%