2014
DOI: 10.1007/s12304-014-9202-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why Language Evolution Needs Memory: Systems and Ecological Approaches

Abstract: The main purpose of this article is to consider the significance of different types of memory and non-genetic ('inclusive', 'extended', 'soft') inheritance and different biosemiotic systems for the origin and evolution of language. It presents language and memory as distributed (objectified, external), heteronomous and system-determined processes implemented in biological and social domains. The article emphasises that language and other sign systems are both (1) ecological and inductive systems that were caus… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our view, this failure was due to the fact that languages were not addressed as intersubjective, transgenerational systems of communication that are embodied in multiple organisms and embedded into social communities or ecosystems (Steffensen, Fill, 2014). Languages are cumulative, sociocultural, and symbolic, and as such, languages presuppose not only fixed innate modules but also broad individual plasticity, cultural inheritance, and socially mediated learning and teaching at a community level (Sukhoverkhov, Fowler, 2014;Laland, 2017;Steels, Szathmáry, 2018).…”
Section: Language Beyond Dna: the Problem Of Language Origin And Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our view, this failure was due to the fact that languages were not addressed as intersubjective, transgenerational systems of communication that are embodied in multiple organisms and embedded into social communities or ecosystems (Steffensen, Fill, 2014). Languages are cumulative, sociocultural, and symbolic, and as such, languages presuppose not only fixed innate modules but also broad individual plasticity, cultural inheritance, and socially mediated learning and teaching at a community level (Sukhoverkhov, Fowler, 2014;Laland, 2017;Steels, Szathmáry, 2018).…”
Section: Language Beyond Dna: the Problem Of Language Origin And Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We think that the origin of this microculture with its own language (1) has direct affordance in the environment of the classroom, as proposed by ecological linguistics, (2) is rooted in the innate competence and cognitive prerequisites of the learners, as nativists indicate, and (3) is the result of social interactions, as argued from symbolic interactionism and sociocultural approaches [65,66].…”
Section: Language Microculture Culture: Theoretical Aspects Of Langmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Natural languages per se are hybrid, dynamic, context-sensitive and eco-logical [Sukhoverkhov, 2014;Steffensen, Fill, 2014;Sukhoverkhov, Fowler, 2015]. Each has its own syntax, multiple word meanings, idioms, innuendos, intertextualities, ecological and cultural embeddedness that sometimes do and sometimes do not coincide with each other.…”
Section: The Language Barrier and Machine Translationmentioning
confidence: 99%