Why Italy First? Health, Geographical and Planning Aspects of the COVID-19 Outbreak

Abstract

COVID-19 hit Italy in February 2020 after its outbreak in China at the beginning of January. Why was Italy first among the Western countries? What are the conditions that made Italy more vulnerable and the first target of this disease? What characteristics and diffusion patterns could be highlighted and hypothesized from its outbreak to the end of March 2020, after containment measures, including a national lockdown, were introduced? In this paper, we try to provide some answers to these questions, analyzing the issue from medical, geographical and planning points of view. With reference to the Italian case, we observed the phenomenon in terms of the spatial diffusion process and by observing the relation between the epidemic and various environmental elements. In particular, we started from a hypothesis of the comparable economic, geographical, climatic and environmental conditions of the areas of Wuhan (in the Hubei Province in China, where the epidemic broke out) and the Po Valley area (in Italy) where most cases and deaths were registered. Via an ecological approach, we compared the spatial distribution and pattern of COVID-19-related mortality in Italy with several geographical, environmental and socio-economic variables at a Provincial level, analyzing them by means of spatial analytical techniques such as LISA (Local Indicators of Spatial Association). Possible evidence arose relating to COVID-19 cases and Nitrogen-related pollutants and land take, particularly in the Po Valley area.

The Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on the Resilience of Sustainable Mobility in Sicily

“…This has led to a large decrease in the number of cars on the street, with most of the citizens having reduced travel to a minimum, also given the high number of checks. It should be noted that in Figure 2 the following dates have been related to the following national events: The highest number of severe cases was recorded in Lombardy, Piedmont, Emilia Romagna, and Marche Regions in accordance with [48]. The COVID-19 emergency resulted in measures such as restricting the movement of people, almost completely blocking urban and rural mobility.…”

“…to set up an urban emergency mobility network >10 km car + bike + micromobility train + bike + micromobility promoting shared mobility and intermodal solutions The highest number of severe cases was recorded in Lombardy, Piedmont, Emilia Romagna, and Marche Regions in accordance with [48]. The COVID-19 emergency resulted in measures such as restricting the movement of people, almost completely blocking urban and rural mobility.…”

The Post Pandemic City: Challenges and Opportunities for a Non-Motorized Urban Environment. An Overview of Italian Cases

“…The disease spread more severely in the Lombardy region and in particular in the Greater Milan Metropolitan area which presents some similarity to the Wuhan urban agglomeration were the epidemic started. [46]. The main metropolitan cities all over the country paid the highest toll in terms of cases and deaths [47].…”

Smart Technologies, Back-to-the-Village Rhetoric, and Tactical Urbanism

“…Italy was the first Western country to be heavily affected by Covid-19 after the first Chinese outbreak, particularly the northern regions which are traditionally more densely urbanized and interconnected in a wider network of global flows (Murgante et al, 2020). Apart from the consequences in terms of health and emergency management, mainstream discourses have been early monopolized by the need to reconsider the ways of moving, using, living and working in the cities, particularly those characterized by high levels of anthropic stress, pollution and wide commuting catchment areas (ie.…”