The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2014
DOI: 10.1080/15348458.2014.939029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why Is This So Hard?: Ideologies of Endangerment, Passive Language Learning Approaches, and Ojibwe in the United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
23
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While it has been long since understood that there is no "one way" to effectively teach or learn a language (Kumaravadivelu, 2006), the fact is that many First Peoples 4 have not had the opportunity to learn how to teach their languages effectively due to a lack of exposure to relevant and accessible theoretical knowledge and practical skills of second language learning. Although both SLA and ILR are currently contributing to this research agenda, King and Hermes (2014) explain there remains a frequent "mismatch between the expectations and the realities of language teaching" (p. 269) for many communities focused on ILR. For example, many Indigenous communities in Canada and in the US teach languages as a subject or in a community classroom setting for a few hours a week with the expectation or hope of creating new speakers of the language (McIvor & Anisman, 2018).…”
Section: Indigenous Languages Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it has been long since understood that there is no "one way" to effectively teach or learn a language (Kumaravadivelu, 2006), the fact is that many First Peoples 4 have not had the opportunity to learn how to teach their languages effectively due to a lack of exposure to relevant and accessible theoretical knowledge and practical skills of second language learning. Although both SLA and ILR are currently contributing to this research agenda, King and Hermes (2014) explain there remains a frequent "mismatch between the expectations and the realities of language teaching" (p. 269) for many communities focused on ILR. For example, many Indigenous communities in Canada and in the US teach languages as a subject or in a community classroom setting for a few hours a week with the expectation or hope of creating new speakers of the language (McIvor & Anisman, 2018).…”
Section: Indigenous Languages Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section we first review literature on Indigenous language revitalization, which considers historical factors that led to the current state of Indigenous languages. Second, we compare three main approaches to Indigenous language teaching and learning methods (King & Hermes, 2014).…”
Section: Theoretical Perspectives On Indigenous Languagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drawn from years of personal IL instructional experience, King and Hermes (2014) describe the three main approaches to Indigenous language learning as: immersion or submersion; book learning; and, performance. Immersion or submersion relies on observation and engagement with proficient language speakers who share "informal narratives" or "conduct ceremonies" (p. 272).…”
Section: Indigenous Language Instructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite the importance of Indigenous adults being successful in their language learning, very few programs for adult Indigenous language acquisition have been documented to date, and most documentation has been limited to short case studies (King & Hermes, 2014;McIvor, 2015;Rātima & Papesch, 2014;Sarivaara, Uusiautti, & Määttä, 2013). The NEȾOLṈEW̱ research project aims to contribute to our understanding of available methods for adult Indigenous language learners and identify successful strategies of language learning for this group.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%