1991
DOI: 10.1016/0031-9201(91)90100-v
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why is the electrical resistivity around the KTB hole so low?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Taking the magmatic body to be of Permian age (Thybo 2001) it means that the conductor could represent the remnants of a major shear zone that was active in Palaeozoic times or earlier. In order to be conductive the shear zone would have to be associated with mineralization of graphites or sulphides related to metamorphic processes (Haak et al 1991a,b) that transported conductive material to its present position (Ritter et al 1999, 2005). The moderately conductive feature reaching the surface at distance 245 km could possible represent another such shear zone that partly survived the emplacement of the magmatic intrusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking the magmatic body to be of Permian age (Thybo 2001) it means that the conductor could represent the remnants of a major shear zone that was active in Palaeozoic times or earlier. In order to be conductive the shear zone would have to be associated with mineralization of graphites or sulphides related to metamorphic processes (Haak et al 1991a,b) that transported conductive material to its present position (Ritter et al 1999, 2005). The moderately conductive feature reaching the surface at distance 245 km could possible represent another such shear zone that partly survived the emplacement of the magmatic intrusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within a few hundred metres of the pilot hole there are outcrops of graphitic material that coincide in location with the minima of anomalies of electrical resistivity (10 52 m) and self potential (-600 mV). These are interpreted as manifestations of deep-reaching zones enriched in dispersed graphite (Haak, Stoll & Winter 1991). At these locations a pronounced induced polarization effect likewise suggests the existence of either graphite or pyrite (Haak et al 1991).…”
Section: Graphite In the Pilot Hole And In Surrounding Boreholesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…They concluded that the high electrical conductivities in the upper crust are primarily caused by graphite accumulations rather than by fluids and that these anomalous conductivities are related to shearing stress regimes. However, it is essential to note that for both graphite and saline fluids, it is their connectivity rather than their pure presence that is the most crucial factor controlling conductivity (ELEKTB Group 1997;Emmermann and Lauterjung 1997;Haak et al 1991;Stoll et al 1995). The ELEKTB Group (1997) also found and concluded that the original (primary) graphite existing in the gneisses cannot be interconnected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%