There is no bigger issue on a global scale today than the COVID-19 pandemic. It is an international issue that has to be managed at an international, national and local level, ideally in cooperation and coordination. It also has to be understood not simply as the cause but as a symptom, not least of globalisation and international hyper-mobility. There is evidence that there are severe shortcoming in the way this is being managed in terms of the cultural and political narrative around it, as well as the strategy, planning and future outcomes. As cross-cultural management scholars we may be able to help. Coronaviruses in humans are passed on from animals. But more importantly, in a globalised world they are transmitted from person to person in close proximity, over thousands of miles. In the case of the latest SARS-CoV-2, it appears to have been derived from a bat-borne virus via an intermediary animal such as a pangolin, one of the most poached and trafficked mammals in the world (Lam et al., 2020). These animals are threatened by heavy deforestation of their natural habitats. In a Guardian article John Vidal (2020) argues that environmental degradation brings more and more exotic species into direct contact with humans after the destruction of their natural habitats. The Ebola outbreak (see WHO, 2020) initially in 1976 in Zaire/DRC, having a mortality rate of up to 88%, is a case in point of animal to human transmission that is likely a result of human destruction of biodiversity, of human activity in the business world. Vidal argues that it was 'human activity, such as road building, mining, hunting and logging that triggered the Ebola epidemics. .. ' He refers to David Quammen's (2020) article in the New York Times, who writes: We invade tropical forests and other wild landscapes, which harbor so many species of animals and plantsand within those creatures, so many unknown viruses. We cut the trees; we kill the animals or cage them and send them to markets. We disrupt ecosystems, and we shake viruses loose from their natural hosts. When that happens, they need a new host. Often, we are it. Human activity is what we study My point here is that the current pandemic, and others that preceded it, and those that inevitably will follow it, are likely to be the result of human activity, not only in the origins of animal to human transference but also in its rapid human to human spread in a highly globalised world. That being the case, and the fact that we as social and behavioural scientists who are interested in all that comprise