2005
DOI: 10.1007/s11145-004-5892-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why is letter-name knowledge such a good predictor of learning to read?

Abstract: The knowledge of letter names measured just before children enter school has been known for a long time as one of the best longitudinal predictors of learning to read in an alphabetic writing system. After a period during which the comprehensive investigation of this relationship was largely disregarded, there is now a growing interest in attempts to understand the role(s) letter names play in literacy acquisition. This paper reviews these recent studies and emphasizes their main findings regarding the influen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
181
4
37

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 305 publications
(242 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
8
181
4
37
Order By: Relevance
“…Many researchers have suggested that children need phonological awareness in order to use letters' names to help learn the letters' sounds (e.g., Bowey, 2005;Foulin, 2005;Share, 2004;Treiman et al, 1998). However, our results suggest that phonological awareness, as commonly measured, is not required in order to benefit from letter names in the learning of letter sounds.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many researchers have suggested that children need phonological awareness in order to use letters' names to help learn the letters' sounds (e.g., Bowey, 2005;Foulin, 2005;Share, 2004;Treiman et al, 1998). However, our results suggest that phonological awareness, as commonly measured, is not required in order to benefit from letter names in the learning of letter sounds.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…What skills are required to make such inferences? Many researchers have assumed that explicit phonological awareness is needed (e.g., Bowey, 2005;Foulin, 2005;Share, 2004;Treiman et al, 1998). According to this view, children must be able to segment a syllable such as /vi/ into /v/ and /i/ in order to derive the letter sound /v/ from the letter name /vi/.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exposure to print (through book reading) and letter names provides children with an opportunity to connect spoken language to printed words, promoting children's sensitivity to individual sounds. In particular, children's knowledge of letter names may be critical for the development of phoneme awareness (Bowey, 1994;Burgess, 2002;Burgess & Lonigan, 1998;Foulin, 2005;Johnston, Anderson, & Holligan, 1996), and some suggested a reciprocal relationship between letter-name knowledge and phoneme awareness (Burgess & Lonigan, 1998;Foy & Mann, 2003).…”
Section: Background and Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O facto de as correlações serem tão elevadas (r= .941) sugere que, em estudos futuros, se possa apenas utilizar uma das variáveis. Estes dados sugerem ainda que, embora as crianças contactem predominantemente com letras impressas maiúsculas, desenvolvem igualmente conhecimentos sobre as letras impressas minúsculas (Cardoso- Martins & Batista, 2005;Foulin, 2005;Viana et al, 2014). As concetualizações infantis sobre a escrita estão também correlacionadas com as variáveis de linguagem oral e consciência fonológica, ainda que com correlações mais baixas.…”
Section: Discussão E Implicaçõesunclassified