Why Is it So Cold in Here? Explaining the Cold Temperatures Retrieved from Transmission Spectra of Exoplanet Atmospheres

Abstract

Transmission spectroscopy is a powerful technique widely used to probe exoplanet terminators. Atmospheric retrievals of transmission spectra are enabling comparative studies of exoplanet atmospheres. However, the atmospheric properties inferred by retrieval techniques display a significant anomaly: most retrieved temperatures are far colder than expected. In some cases, retrieved temperatures are ∼ 1000 K colder than T eq . Here, we provide an explanation for this conundrum. We demonstrate that erroneously cold temperatures result when 1D atmospheric models are applied to spectra of planets with differing morning-evening terminator compositions. Despite providing an acceptable fit, 1D retrieval techniques artificially tune atmospheric parameters away from terminator-averaged properties. Retrieved temperature profiles are hundreds of degrees cooler and have weaker temperature gradients than reality. Retrieved abundances are mostly biased by > 1σ and sometimes by > 3σ, with the most extreme biases for ultra-hot Jupiters. When morning-evening compositional differences manifest for prominent opacity sources, H 2 O abundances retrieved by 1D models can be biased by over an order of magnitude. Finally, we demonstrate that these biases provide an explanation for the cold retrieved temperatures reported for WASP-17b and WASP-12b. To overcome biases associated with 1D atmospheric models, there is an urgent need to develop multidimensional retrieval techniques.

KELT-11 b: Abundances of Water and Constraints on Carbon-bearing Molecules from the Hubble Transmission Spectrum

“…Thus, identification of a near-visible absorber and/or its precise abundance is likely to be biased by systematic offsets when TES and HST is used. Finally, most of our retrievals recover a well-defined temperature around 1300 K, which is expected from previous transit observations (Tsiaras et al 2018;Caldas et al 2019;MacDonald et al 2020;Skaf et al 2020). However, this disagrees with the findings from Colón et al (2020), which find a lower limit on the temperature of about 1900 K. These differences could either be due to the use of different reduction/retrieval pipelines or differences in the choice of models (temperature/clouds).…”

The exoplanet perspective on future ice giant exploration

“…Additionally, thermal and chemical profiles across various latitudes are useful comparisons against exoplanet retrievals. Many studies have shown that globally averaged thermal profiles are not effective at interpreting transmission [20,27] or emission [28,29] spectra. Instead, multiple profiles simulating the integrated 2D/3D environment, including the radiative effects of aerosols, are needed to understand the nature of these exoplanet atmospheres.…”

On The Compatibility of Ground-based and Space-based Data: WASP-96 b, An Example

“…173 K, which is lower than the equilibrium temperature of the planet and much lower than the temperature obtained by Nikolov et al (2018). Simulations have demonstrated that the complexity of the terminator limb, which includes three-dimensional asymmetries in the chemical and thermal structure of the terminator region, often affects the absolute retrieved temperature and can have biases (Caldas et al 2019;MacDonald et al 2020;Pluriel et al 2020a). A lower than expected temperature is often retrieved from HST WFC3 data (e.g., Skaf et al 2020).…”