Why Intelligence Is Missing from American Education Policy and Practice, and What Can Be Done About It

Abstract

To understand why education as a field has not incorporated intelligence, we must consider the field’s history and culture. Accordingly, in this cross-disciplinary collaboration between a political scientist who studies institutions and a psychologist who studies intelligence, we outline how the roots of contemporary American Educational Leadership as a field determine its contemporary avoidance of the concept of intelligence. Rooted in early 20th century progressivism and scientific management, Educational Leadership theory envisions professionally run schools as “Taylorist” factories with teaching and leadership largely standardized, prioritizing compliance over cognitive ability among educators. Further, the roots of modern education theory do not see the intelligence of students as largely malleable. Hence, prioritizing intelligence is viewed as elitist. For more than a century, these assumptions have impacted recruitment into education as a profession. We conclude with ideas about how to bring intelligence into mainstream schooling, within the existing K-12 education institutional context. We believe that better integration of intelligence and broader individual differences research in education policy and practice would lead to more rapid advances to finding evidence based solutions to help children.

General Intelligence and Socioeconomic Status as Strong Predictors of Student Performance in Latin American Schools: Evidence From PISA Items

“…Despite the gathering of information and analysis of a wide range of psychosocial variables, no PISA survey considered the administration of intelligence measures. Historical and cultural reasons may underlie why education policies take no notice of the concept of intelligence (Maranto and Wai, 2020). As this study will demonstrate, intelligence exerts a strong influence on student performance beyond socioeconomic factors, a critical point that has been ignored in the educational field.…”

Can You Ever Be Too Smart for Your Own Good? Comparing Linear and Nonlinear Effects of Cognitive Ability on Life Outcomes

“…This is akin to broader trends in science, where perceptions among the general public are found to conflict with those held within the scientific community (e.g., regarding the safety of vaccines or genetically modified organisms). The lack of acceptance of cognitive ability in education and other applied fields is also worth considering (e.g., Maranto & Wai, 2020;Wai et al, 2018;Wiliam, 2019).…”

Covid, Capitol Insurrection, And (A Lack Of) Education—Time For E.D. Hirsch?

“…In both teachers and leaders, the Cardinal Principles prioritized compliance over intelligence. Experts would tell others what they needed to know, and those holding graduate degrees in education by dint of degrees, titles, and maleness became experts, even if their actual knowledge was limited, and their ideas questionable (Hirsch, 1996(Hirsch, , 2009Maranto, 2020a;Maranto & Wai, 2020). I see this anti-academic ideology often in fieldwork, as when an award winning public school principal declared that the most exciting thing about his school was not students learning math, science, great literature, or the U.S. Constitution, but rather "developing their own brand on social media."…”