2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.12.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why hospitals adopt patient engagement functionalities at different speeds? A moderated trend analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous research shows that organization characteristics such as hospital size, system membership, ownership, and teaching status are important to understanding the propensity to technology adoption. 4,23 Hospital size (small: 0-99 beds, medium: 100-399 beds, large: 400+ beds) is an accepted factor in predicting organizational capacity. 24 Thus, hospital characteristics that were included in the study based on past research contribution were hospital size (small: 0-99 beds, medium: 100-399 beds, large: 400+ beds), hospital ownership (for-profit, not-for-profit, and nonfederal government), teaching affiliation (major teaching, minor teaching, and nonteaching), hospital location (rural and urban), critical access hospital, part of a system, and part of a network.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research shows that organization characteristics such as hospital size, system membership, ownership, and teaching status are important to understanding the propensity to technology adoption. 4,23 Hospital size (small: 0-99 beds, medium: 100-399 beds, large: 400+ beds) is an accepted factor in predicting organizational capacity. 24 Thus, hospital characteristics that were included in the study based on past research contribution were hospital size (small: 0-99 beds, medium: 100-399 beds, large: 400+ beds), hospital ownership (for-profit, not-for-profit, and nonfederal government), teaching affiliation (major teaching, minor teaching, and nonteaching), hospital location (rural and urban), critical access hospital, part of a system, and part of a network.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the general field of organizational technology adoption, Tornatzky and Fleischer [ 17 ] developed the TOE framework, which is a generic framework that comprehensively covers potential areas of relevant influence on organizational technology adoption structured by 3 different contexts: a technological context, an organizational context, and an environmental context [ 22 ]. The TOE framework has been extensively applied to study hospitals’ adoption of various information technologies [ 23 - 25 ]. A strength (and weakness) of the TOE framework is its general applicability [ 22 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The organizational context of the TOE framework refers to the organizations’ internal structures and processes that may facilitate or constrain the adoption of new information technology [ 18 , 46 ]. One basic organizational factor included in many TOE studies on the adoption of technology in hospitals is the hospital size [ 23 , 24 , 47 , 48 ]. The findings of these studies are mainly similar, showing that larger hospitals adopt new technologies faster.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations