Common classifications are pseudo-democratic, semi-democratic, hybrid or electoral authoritarian regimes. 7 This point is made well by Diamond (2002): "Tracking the interplay between changes in political competition and changes in political repression may thus help us understand when and how moments of possible transition open and close in electoral authoritarian regimes….As democracies differ among themselves in significant ways and degrees, so do contemporary authoritarian regimes, and if we are to understand the contemporary dynamics, cause, limits, and possibilities of regime change (including possible future democratization), we must understand the different, and in some respects new, types of authoritarian rule" (23). 93 This was a sentiment widely expressed in interviews and informal conversations during my fieldwork in Jordan. Dr. 'Abd al-Latif 'Arrabiyyat, for example, called the 11 th Parliament the "peak" of parliamentary life in Jordan. Moreover, in its official statement explaining the 1997 boycott, the Muslim Brotherhood argued that "during the period from 1989 to 1993, the 11 th parliamentary session witnessed a democratic awakening which became evident by issuance of a host of laws that established grounds for a more advanced political life, such as the law of political parties, the 1993 press and publication law, the law of the state of the security court, the law of municipalities and the abolition of marital law."