2008
DOI: 10.1017/s0003598x00097362
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why handaxes just aren't that sexy: a response to Kohn & Mithen (1999)

Abstract: The Acheulean handaxe is one of the most iconic, analysed and fiercely debated artefacts from the prehistoric period. Persisting for over one million years and recovered from sites across the Old World its distinctive, often symmetrical, tear drop or ovate shape appears to be over-engineered for a subsistence function alone. Debate has centred upon trying to unravel the reasons for this form; raw material, knapping technique, subsistence function, cognition, social context of manufacture and sexual selection h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, this innovation is matched at times by greater symmetry in tool forms, particularly among Acheulean bifaces. Such symmetry has attracted comment from a cognitive perspective (Hodgson 2009;Wynn 1979) as well as interpretations of sexual selection (Kohn & Mithen 1999;Machin 2008;Nowell & Chang 2009) and has been compared to the attention skills found in strong emotional bonding between dyads (Dunbar 2010b; Gamble 2010).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, this innovation is matched at times by greater symmetry in tool forms, particularly among Acheulean bifaces. Such symmetry has attracted comment from a cognitive perspective (Hodgson 2009;Wynn 1979) as well as interpretations of sexual selection (Kohn & Mithen 1999;Machin 2008;Nowell & Chang 2009) and has been compared to the attention skills found in strong emotional bonding between dyads (Dunbar 2010b; Gamble 2010).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In short, the overall role of symmetry in eliciting positive reactions to potential mates, a clear prerequisite for the sexy handaxe theory, was not conclusively demonstrated (Hodgson, 2009;Hodgson, 2010;Nowell and Chang, 2009;Nowell and Chang, 2010). The role of material culture in acting as an extended phenotype was therefore called into question (Machin, 2008;Machin, 2009;Machin et al, 2007). For the moment, the sexy handaxes remain unselected wallflowers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The duration of the handaxe tradition has led some researchers to even think that handaxe manufacture may have been more related to sexual selection than functionality (Kohn and Mithen, 1999; for a critical view see Machin, 2008). The functional meaning of handaxes has remained elusive for so long that some researchers even argued that handaxes may have served as blanks for flake extraction (Potts, 1989;Davidson and Noble, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%