Why government supported smart city initiatives fail: Examining community risk and benefit agreements as a missing link to accountability for equity-seeking groups

Abstract

This paper utilizes concepts from a critical social justice discourse on smart cities to identify factors behind resistance to new smart city initiatives from equity-seeking groups. The broader critical discourse is examined based on relevance to the eventual failure of the initiatives selected as case studies. It highlights institutional failure within government-supported initiatives due to the lack of consideration given to equitable distribution of risks and formal accountability mechanisms. It describes outcomes surrounding smart cities in which the benefits accrue to some groups within the city while risks increase for other groups. Finally, we examine the integration of “risk” as an adaptation to the existing practical mechanism of Community Benefit Agreements, for use of this framework to support value sensitive design approaches in future smart city initiatives.

Slow-governance in smart cities: An empirical study of smart intersection implementation in four US college towns

“…Our focus is on the community governance of supposedly smart techno-social systems in cities. This focus and framing connects two other stands of research litera-ture on smart cities: critical social justice discourse (e.g., Heeks & Shekar, 2019;Sengupta & Sengupta, 2022) and institutional approaches (e.g., Bushouse, 2011).…”

Smart Cities and Urban Energy Planning: An Advanced Review of Promises and Challenges

“…Urban planners and policymakers may encounter another notable challenge in the form of limited public engagement and acceptance [101,102]. These are particularly evident in smart city proposals that seek to modify city structures, such as changes in density and land use zones, or even renovating problematic urban areas aimed at optimizing the potential benefits of smart cities such as improving exposure to sunlight and natural ventilation or reducing buildings' operational and travel-related energy consumption.…”

Preventing long-term risks to human rights in smart cities: A critical review of responsibilities for private AI developers

“…Smart cities are often introduced to provide services "such as education, healthcare, sanitation, drinking water, and mobility", in an equitable manner (Jiang et al, 2022(Jiang et al, , p. 1639. However, many smart cities have failed to live up to expectations (Sengupta & Sengupta, 2022) and significant risks are posed to human rights closely related to these services (Marlies Hesselman et al, 2017).…”