SAE Technical Paper Series 1970
DOI: 10.4271/700108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why Engine Variables Affect Exhaust Hydrocarbon Emission

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, experimental uncertainty, especially in In Figure 8, hydrocarbon emissions are shown to increase as the mixture was leaned or as compression ratio was increased. Both of these trends are in agreement with previous studies (Daniel, 1970;Patterson and Henein, 1972). One factor which can generate higher hydrocarbon emissions, as the engine is leaned, is the increased (MBT) spark advance.…”
Section: Exhaust Emissionssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, experimental uncertainty, especially in In Figure 8, hydrocarbon emissions are shown to increase as the mixture was leaned or as compression ratio was increased. Both of these trends are in agreement with previous studies (Daniel, 1970;Patterson and Henein, 1972). One factor which can generate higher hydrocarbon emissions, as the engine is leaned, is the increased (MBT) spark advance.…”
Section: Exhaust Emissionssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…One factor which can generate higher hydrocarbon emissions, as the engine is leaned, is the increased (MBT) spark advance. Daniel (1970) has shown that advanced spark timing results both in greater density of hydrocarbons in combustion chamber crevices and in reduced oxidation of the hydrocarbons within the exhaust system. Another factor is the increased compression ratio which produces both increased quench and crevice hydrocarbons and reduced exhaust after-reaction (Daniel, 1970).…”
Section: Exhaust Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An excellent example of the value of practical applications using one-dimensional simulations is that of flame quenching on the internal walls of engine combustion chambers. As late as 1970, 68 the common belief in the automobile industry was that flame quenching on spark-ignition (SI) engine combustion chamber walls was responsible for a significant fraction of the unburned hydrocarbon emissions from such engines. However, shortly after the earliest development of detailed kinetic mechanisms for methane, ethane, acetylene, and methanol (by about 1980), laminar flame modeling of the ''head-on collision'' of a laminar flame with a cooled solid combustion chamber wall demonstrated that, while a quench layer near the engine wall is indeed produced, the fuel in that quench layer rapidly diffuse out to the hot, stationary flame zone away from the wall and are almost entirely consumed.…”
Section: Comprehensive Mechanisms and Mechanism Validation Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using measured pCB) data from Daniel (1970), Cf was computed and compared to exhaust concentrations for eleven different cases encompassing five engine operating parameters: fuel-air ratio, airflow, spark timing, compression ratio, and engine speed. The trends of the computed results agreed very well with the corresponding trends of the mea sured exhaust concentrations.…”
Section: Model Performancementioning
confidence: 99%