2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2006.01.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why dynamos are prone to reversals

Abstract: In a recent paper [1] it was shown that a simple mean-field dynamo model with a spherically symmetric helical turbulence parameter α can exhibit a number of features which are typical for Earth's magnetic field reversals. In particular, the model produces asymmetric reversals (with a slow decay of the dipole of one polarity and a fast recreation of the dipole with opposite polarity), a positive correlation of field strength and interval length, and a bimodal field distribution. All these features are attributa… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Actually, it is the negative slope of this curve between the local maximum and the exceptional point that makes the system unstable and drives it to the exceptional point and beyond into the oscillatory branch where the sign change happens. The apparent weakness of this reversal model, namely the necessity to fine-tune the radial profile of α in order to adjust the operator spectrum in an appropriate way, was overcome in a follow-up paper (Stefani et al, 2006a). For highly supercritical dynamos the exceptional point and the associated local growth rate maximum were demonstrated to tend towards the zero growth rate line where the indicated reversal scenario can be actual-on statistical properties of reversals is left for future works.…”
Section: α 2 Dynamomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actually, it is the negative slope of this curve between the local maximum and the exceptional point that makes the system unstable and drives it to the exceptional point and beyond into the oscillatory branch where the sign change happens. The apparent weakness of this reversal model, namely the necessity to fine-tune the radial profile of α in order to adjust the operator spectrum in an appropriate way, was overcome in a follow-up paper (Stefani et al, 2006a). For highly supercritical dynamos the exceptional point and the associated local growth rate maximum were demonstrated to tend towards the zero growth rate line where the indicated reversal scenario can be actual-on statistical properties of reversals is left for future works.…”
Section: α 2 Dynamomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The correlation time T c has always been set to 0.005 · T c which would correspond to 1 kyr in case that the diffusion time is set to 200 kyr. The resulting time series show reversal sequences quite similar to those of the geodynamo [23,26,29]. For the sake of simplicity, we define a reversal as the sign change of the poloidal field component s(1, τ ) at the outer radius r = 1.…”
Section: The Forward Problemmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This simple model had turned out to be quite helpful for understanding the basic principle of the reversal process as a noise-induced relaxation-oscillation in the vicinity of an exceptional point of the spectrum of the non-selfadjoint dynamo operator [23,25,26]. This exceptional point, at which two real eigenvalues coalesce and continue as a complex conjugated pair of eigenvalues, is associated with a nearby local maximum of the growth rate situated at a slightly lower magnetic Reynolds number.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Solving such inverse spectral dynamo problems by means of an evolutionary strategy it was possible to obtain such α(r) profiles that lead to oscillatory dynamo solutions [58]. This model was later used to develop simple models of geomagnetic reversals that are just based on noise triggered jumps and relaxation oscillations in the vicinity of spectral exceptional points [59,60,61]. On this basis, a first attempt was further made to infer some of the most essential parameters of the geodynamo, such as its overcriticality and the turbulent resistivity from the temporal behavior and the statistical properties of field reversals [62].…”
Section: Inverse Problems At Large Rmmentioning
confidence: 99%