2008
DOI: 10.2989/south.for.2008.70.2.5.533
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why don't our stands grow even faster? Control of production and carbon cycling in eucalypt plantations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar trends have been measured in Eucalyptus saligna and Eucalyptus laevopinea forests (Cornish and Vertessy, 2001) and studies in other genera have shown that stand transpiration peaks around the time of maximum growth rates and stand leaf area before declining with age (Kö stner et al, 2002;Delzon and Loustau, 2005). These same trends are likely to occur in Eucalyptus plantations, where peaks in current annual increments and LAI often occur before age 15 years and in some cases as early as age 2 or 3 years (Florence, 1996;Almeida et al, 2007;du Toit, 2008;Ryan et al, 2008). The objective of this study was to determine (i) if stand transpiration declined with age after reaching an early peak, (ii) if this decline is associated with a decline in leaf area index and current annual growth rates, and (iii) how water use efficiency (stand biomass or volume production per unit water transpired) changes with time?…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Similar trends have been measured in Eucalyptus saligna and Eucalyptus laevopinea forests (Cornish and Vertessy, 2001) and studies in other genera have shown that stand transpiration peaks around the time of maximum growth rates and stand leaf area before declining with age (Kö stner et al, 2002;Delzon and Loustau, 2005). These same trends are likely to occur in Eucalyptus plantations, where peaks in current annual increments and LAI often occur before age 15 years and in some cases as early as age 2 or 3 years (Florence, 1996;Almeida et al, 2007;du Toit, 2008;Ryan et al, 2008). The objective of this study was to determine (i) if stand transpiration declined with age after reaching an early peak, (ii) if this decline is associated with a decline in leaf area index and current annual growth rates, and (iii) how water use efficiency (stand biomass or volume production per unit water transpired) changes with time?…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…In our study, canopy structural complexity was greater in plots with higher site quality, regardless of stand age. In higherquality sites, trees allocate more to aboveground biomass production, accelerating stand structural development (Litton et al 2007, Ryan et al 2008. In spite of varying rates of change in canopy structural complexity, we observed a clear increase in rugosity with age, underscoring the convenience of age as a proxy, but emphasizing how little understanding of underlying mechanisms it provides.…”
Section: Changing Canopy Rugosity Over Timementioning
confidence: 74%
“…In a study of E. nitens and E. globulus, Moroni et al (2003) demonstrated that root length density and root frequency were greater on droughtsimulated soils compared to those under irrigation. Changes in biomass allocation to favour above-ground growth at the expense of below-ground growth has been observed following fertiliser application and irrigation (Giardina et al, 2003;Ryan et al, 2008;Stape et al, 2008). While this increases volume production, it may also increase drought susceptibility and reduce stand stability.…”
Section: Stand Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%