2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2013.06.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why does titanium alloy wear cobalt chrome alloy despite lower bulk hardness: A nanoindentation study?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
48
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
8
48
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The wear fractions for a CoCr alloy head and Ti alloy stem combination have been specified as 0.9 and 0.1 respectively. This is due to preferential oxidation of the Ti alloy over the CoCr, which increases the hardness of the Ti and wears the un-oxidised CoCr, as has been published previously (Bishop et al, 2013;Bone et al, 2015;Langton et al, 2011a;Moharrami et al, 2013). …”
Section: Implementation Of the Wear Lawsupporting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The wear fractions for a CoCr alloy head and Ti alloy stem combination have been specified as 0.9 and 0.1 respectively. This is due to preferential oxidation of the Ti alloy over the CoCr, which increases the hardness of the Ti and wears the un-oxidised CoCr, as has been published previously (Bishop et al, 2013;Bone et al, 2015;Langton et al, 2011a;Moharrami et al, 2013). …”
Section: Implementation Of the Wear Lawsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Further investigation is required to consider the effect of the surface roughness on the wear rates at the taper junction of THRs and will form the basis of a future study. Finally, the wear fraction used in this study is based on the theory of titanium hardening in vivo, which happens where the wear depth reaches to around 0.15 µm (Moharrami et al, 2013). Although this wear depth occurs at an early stage of the wear analysis, further investigation is required to consider varying the wear fraction during the wear analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A scenario where passivated cobalt exists alongside depassivated titanium is conceivable given the higher bulk hardness of Co-Cr and the even harder carbides present in as-cast and HC wrought Co-Cr [16]. Through micromotion these carbide asperites are more than capable of disrupting the softer titanium oxide layer [60].…”
Section: Mixed-alloy Couplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Possibly pointing at the cause, sputter pit depth measurements demonstrate that the oxide thickness in titanium alloys is significantly greater (150>nm) than the oxide layer formed on Co-Cr, which is only several nanometers thick. Furthermore, nanoindentation studies have found that the thicker titanium oxide is significantly harder than the unoxidized Co-Cr surface [60].This interplay between oxidation and wear-altering material changes alludes to the coupled and complex relationship between wear and corrosion. …”
Section: Mechanically Assisted Corrosionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface hardness of the titanium is only about 6-8GPa and considerably lower than the 17GPa hardness of the ZTA and is not expected to be able to scratch it. However, once implanted in the human body the both components are exposed to aqueous conditions at a temperature of 37 o C. In such conditions the titanium alloy will oxidise forming a surface oxide [51] with a hardness of about 15GPa (Figure 10b) whilst the ZTA undergoes chemomechanical softening and its hardness is reduced to a similar level (Figure 10a). The titanium oxide produced is x-ray amorphous and shows no chemomechanical softening.…”
Section: Chemomechanical Effects On Complex Contactsmentioning
confidence: 99%