1998
DOI: 10.1006/brln.1997.1936
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why Does Monitoring Fail in Jargon Aphasia? Comprehension, Judgment, and Therapy Evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
59
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
5
59
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Failures in error detection may result from various causes, including the patients' inability to accurately compare the actual with the intended output (Marshall et al, 1998). In line with this hypothesis, some studies (Shuren et al, 1995;Marshall et al, 1998;Maher et al, 1994) have reported on patients whose detection of speech errors was better when they were asked to listen to their own previously tape-recorded performance (off-line condition), than they did while speaking (on-line condition). In particular, Maher et al (1994) systematically investigated error detection ability in one aphasic patient (case AS) during on-line and off-line conditions.…”
Section: Error Detection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Failures in error detection may result from various causes, including the patients' inability to accurately compare the actual with the intended output (Marshall et al, 1998). In line with this hypothesis, some studies (Shuren et al, 1995;Marshall et al, 1998;Maher et al, 1994) have reported on patients whose detection of speech errors was better when they were asked to listen to their own previously tape-recorded performance (off-line condition), than they did while speaking (on-line condition). In particular, Maher et al (1994) systematically investigated error detection ability in one aphasic patient (case AS) during on-line and off-line conditions.…”
Section: Error Detection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Therefore, the association of unawareness with jargon and sensory aphasia, and the fact that monitoring relies on intact comprehension, has led researchers to maintain that poor comprehension would prevent accurate monitoring and discovery of the deficit (e.g., Boller et al, 1978;Wernicke, 1874;Heilman, 1991). Other studies, however, reported that some anosognosic patients could recognise their own speech errors when listening to their recorded performance (Shuren et al, 1995;Marshall et al, 1998) or if the errors were attributed to other persons (Alajouanine, 1956;Kinsbourne & Warrington, 1963;Maher et al, 1994), suggesting other possible causes for anosognosia than a comprehension deficit.…”
Section: Anosognosia For Language Impairmentmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations