Why Do You Believe in God? Relationships between Religious Belief, Analytic Thinking, Mentalizing and Moral Concern

Abstract

Prior work has established that analytic thinking is associated with disbelief in God, whereas religious and spiritual beliefs have been positively linked to social and emotional cognition. However, social and emotional cognition can be subdivided into a number of distinct dimensions, and some work suggests that analytic thinking is in tension with some aspects of social-emotional cognition. This leaves open two questions. First, is belief linked to social and emotional cognition in general, or a specific dimension in particular? Second, does the negative relationship between belief and analytic thinking still hold after relationships with social and emotional cognition are taken into account? We report eight hypothesis-driven studies which examine these questions. These studies are guided by a theoretical model which focuses on the distinct social and emotional processing deficits associated with autism spectrum disorders (mentalizing) and psychopathy (moral concern). To our knowledge no other study has investigated both of these dimensions of social and emotion cognition alongside analytic thinking. We find that religious belief is robustly positively associated with moral concern (4 measures), and that at least part of the negative association between belief and analytic thinking (2 measures) can be explained by a negative correlation between moral concern and analytic thinking. Using nine different measures of mentalizing, we found no evidence of a relationship between mentalizing and religious or spiritual belief. These findings challenge the theoretical view that religious and spiritual beliefs are linked to the perception of agency, and suggest that gender differences in religious belief can be explained by differences in moral concern. These findings are consistent with the opposing domains hypothesis, according to which brain areas associated with moral concern and analytic thinking are in tension.

The Franciscan Prayer Elicits Empathic and Cooperative Intentions in Atheists: A Neurocognitive and Phenomenological Enquiry

“…Rather, results agree with reports suggesting a negative association between religiosity and analytic thinking as shown in academic studies that evaluate arguments related to beliefs (Tinoco, 1998;Jack et al, 2016). Accordingly, tension between religiosity and analytic thinking is present in the participant's testimonies.…”

“…However, morality is so influenced by religious beliefs that some authors propose that brain functions related with moral concern and those related to analytic thinking are in tension (Jack et al, 2016). Along these lines, some fMRI studies have shown that while performing deontological moral judgments Catholic practitioners recruit the precuneus and temporoparietal junction, but activate the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and temporal poles while performing utilitarian judgments.…”

Intelligence and Religiosity among Dating Site Users

“…Item bias still has the potential to explain part or all of these relationships, as it did recently for the results of an actively open-minded thinking questionnaire [28]. It remains possible-though we were unable to test this-that these results may be explained by other mediators such as death salience, moral concern, conformism, attachment style, executive control, or analytical thinking style [29][30][31][32].…”

Seeking the supernatural: the Interactive Religious Experience Model

“…This is important. But follow-up studies failed to replicate the previously observed negative association between autism and supernatural beliefs (Jack, Friedman, Boyatzis, & Taylor, 2016;Maij, van Harreveld, et al, 2017). Importantly, in a large sample collected in the US and the Netherlands, the variance of autistic traits in explaining religious belief was close to zero.…”