1988
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8543.1988.tb00745.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why Do Workers Belong to a Trade Union?: A Social Psychological Study in the UK Electronics Industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
64
0
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
64
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, left-wing views are associated with a higher probability of union membership (see Table 2). In some but not all studies, feelings of dissatisfaction with various aspects of work and pay are also found to significantly increase the probability of unionisation (see Guest and Dewe, 1988;Berg and Groot, 1992). The image of the union also plays a role (cf.…”
Section: Micro-determinants Of Union Membership: Empirical Results Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, left-wing views are associated with a higher probability of union membership (see Table 2). In some but not all studies, feelings of dissatisfaction with various aspects of work and pay are also found to significantly increase the probability of unionisation (see Guest and Dewe, 1988;Berg and Groot, 1992). The image of the union also plays a role (cf.…”
Section: Micro-determinants Of Union Membership: Empirical Results Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 9 In a different setting, Jones and McKenna (1994) show that in case a union is able to offer greater employment protection for its members, employed workers join the union if the marginal benefit of protection is at least as great as union dues, and their dynamic model permits a variety of relationships between employment and membership in the adjustment to steady state. 10 Examples of psychological and socio-political approaches to unionization can be found, inter alia, in Crouch (1982), Klandermans (1984Klandermans ( , 1986, Guest and Dewe (1988), Wallerstein (1989), Windolf and Haas (1989), Western (1997), Rij and Daalder (1997) and Visser (2002).…”
Section: Supplementary Explanations From the Social Sciencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We adapted our scale of job satisfaction from Guest and Dewe (1988). Based on the framework of Friedman et al (2006), job satisfaction could be studied from four dimensions, each of which was made up of four items -career prospect ("promotion opportunity", "company's recognition of employee performance", "company's concern for employee suggestions" and "job responsibilities"; α=0.923), working environment ("work flexibility", "skill development opportunity", "training opportunity" and "working condition"; α=0.844), working stress ("working hours", "difficulty of tasks", "task load" and "performance assessment system"; α=0.850) and compensation and benefits ("compensation", "bonus", "vacation" and "family time"; α=0.888).…”
Section: Job Satisfactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Job satisfaction, subjective norms, labor union image and personal attitude were some of the common recurring themes in academic researches (c.f. Booth, 1985;Fiorito & Greer, 1982;Guest & Dewe, 1988;Iverson & Kuruvilla, 2007;Khaleque, 1993;Parkes & Razavi, 2004;Premack & Hunter, 1988;Schriesheim, 1978;Voos, 1983). Among them, job satisfaction and union instrumentality, which means the perceived effective use of union movements to obtain outcomes that are beneficial to both organizations and employees, were two of the most important antecedents to unionization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A short overview of psychological and socio-political theories of union membership and participation can also be found in Guest and Dewe (1988). Earlier contributions from sociologists and political scientists -stressing the importance of factors such as class consciousness, values, modes of production, the composition of the workforce, the political climate, the role of government incomes policies, and the centralisation and cohesiveness of the labour movement -include Streeck (1981) and Beyme (1981).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%