2002
DOI: 10.1006/redy.2002.0190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why Do Women Wait? Matching, Wage Inequality, and the Incentives for Fertility Delay

Abstract: This paper explores the interaction between wage inequality and the marriage and fertility decisions of young women. We develop an equilibrium search model of marriage, divorce, and investment in children that allows for differential timing of fertility. We show how patterns of fertility timing in U.S. data can be explained by the incentives for fertility delay implied by marriage and labor markets. We find that these incentives help explain both the cross-sectional relationship between women's wages and ferti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
107
0
5

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
6
107
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…8 Turning to the converse relationship, previous work has associated fertility timing with male and female wages in time-series (Butz and Ward, 1979) and cross-sectional data (Heckman and Walker, 1990). Happel et al (1984) finds that women in higher-paying occupations choose longer intervals from first marriage to motherhood, and Caucutt et al (2002) associates higher female earnings with delayed motherhood. These correlations are similar to the ones noted in Hofferth (1984), only viewed from a different perspective.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8 Turning to the converse relationship, previous work has associated fertility timing with male and female wages in time-series (Butz and Ward, 1979) and cross-sectional data (Heckman and Walker, 1990). Happel et al (1984) finds that women in higher-paying occupations choose longer intervals from first marriage to motherhood, and Caucutt et al (2002) associates higher female earnings with delayed motherhood. These correlations are similar to the ones noted in Hofferth (1984), only viewed from a different perspective.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fertility delay has been increasing concurrently with female education, labor force participation, and earnings in Europe since 1960 (Gustafsson, 2001), and in the United States since the post-war baby boom (Chen and Morgan, 1991;Caucutt et al, 2002). Hofferth (1984) noted the cross-sectional correlation almost two decades ago in data from the 1976 Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason is that while our model was calibrated to an aggregate fertility rate of 2.1, the data in the first column implies an average of 1.8 children per woman. 12 Therefore, we could not ask the model to reproduce the fertility rate together with the distribution of children in the first column. However, this comparison shows that the model generates a reasonable distribution of number of children across females.…”
Section: Fertility and Labor Turnover By Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The duration of the first stage of life is selected so that the fraction of individuals who do not marry, that is transit to the second stage of life, by age 27, corresponds to the estimate for the cohort born in the period 1948-1957 reported in Table IV of Caucutt et al (2002). Life is assumed to begin at age 18 and we assume the average durations for the three stages are 6, 39, and 9 years.…”
Section: Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%