1926
DOI: 10.2307/2341482
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why do we Sometimes get Nonsense-Correlations between Time-Series?--A Study in Sampling and the Nature of Time-Series

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
323
0
27

Year Published

1958
1958
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 969 publications
(386 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
7
323
0
27
Order By: Relevance
“…In effect, any trend function that we postulate in an econometric specification will turn out to be statistically significant in large samples provided the data do in fact have a trend, whether it is of the same form as that specified in the empirical regression or belongs to a general alternative such as (2). The history of this subject has early beginnings dating back to the formal discussion by Yule (1926) [31] and beyond. Over the last two decades, the case of multivariate regression of unit root processes (including independent random walks) was analyzed in [15] and that of polynomial trends fitted to stochastic trends by Durlauf and Phillips [4].…”
Section: No One Understands Trendsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In effect, any trend function that we postulate in an econometric specification will turn out to be statistically significant in large samples provided the data do in fact have a trend, whether it is of the same form as that specified in the empirical regression or belongs to a general alternative such as (2). The history of this subject has early beginnings dating back to the formal discussion by Yule (1926) [31] and beyond. Over the last two decades, the case of multivariate regression of unit root processes (including independent random walks) was analyzed in [15] and that of polynomial trends fitted to stochastic trends by Durlauf and Phillips [4].…”
Section: No One Understands Trendsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Seemingly significant (with respect to standard t-statistics) coefficients may emerge from regressions of stochastically independent variables on each other, hence the name 'spurious'. This phenomenon was first observed by Yule (1926), and analyzed analytically in Phillips (1986). In order to obtain meaningful regression results from a regression containing integrated variables, it is necessary that these variables are cointegrated, i.e.…”
Section: Unit Roots Cointegration and Cross-sectional Dependencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consider the AR(1) process below: Yule (1926). Granger and Newbold (1974) argue that it is a good rule of thumb to suspect that the estimated regression is spurious if R 2 is greater than Durbin-Watson d value; that is R 2 >d.…”
Section: Stationarity and Unit Root Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%