2011
DOI: 10.1057/eps.2011.37
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Why Do We Need to Protect Institutional Diversity?

Abstract: In past decades, scholars have tended to recommend 'optimal' solutions for coping with common-pool resources. Examples exist of both successful and unsuccessful efforts to establish government property, private property, or community property. The absence of any property rightsopen access -related to valuable resources is associated with overuse. The resource institutions that research has documented as working well in the field differ substantially in their detailed design but can usually be characterised as … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
26
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite this, some scholars misperceive Ostrom's stance as anti-state and anti-privatization (Mansbridge, 2010). Careful reading of her works (Ostrom, 1990(Ostrom, , 1998(Ostrom, , 2007(Ostrom, , 2010, however, confirms that her approach is rather against a simple blueprint solution, be it state, privatization, or user self-governance, for resolving all CPR problems (Ostrom, 2007(Ostrom, , 2012. In other words, she emphasized that a complex, diagnostic approach that can accommodate the role of the state rather than a simple panacea can better resolve the commons dilemma (Basurto et al, 2013;Ostrom, 2007).…”
Section: Arguments About the Governance Of The Commons Or Common Poolmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Despite this, some scholars misperceive Ostrom's stance as anti-state and anti-privatization (Mansbridge, 2010). Careful reading of her works (Ostrom, 1990(Ostrom, , 1998(Ostrom, , 2007(Ostrom, , 2010, however, confirms that her approach is rather against a simple blueprint solution, be it state, privatization, or user self-governance, for resolving all CPR problems (Ostrom, 2007(Ostrom, , 2012. In other words, she emphasized that a complex, diagnostic approach that can accommodate the role of the state rather than a simple panacea can better resolve the commons dilemma (Basurto et al, 2013;Ostrom, 2007).…”
Section: Arguments About the Governance Of The Commons Or Common Poolmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Special Feature: Urban ecology in, of, and for the city characterizations of population embodied in the decadal U.S. census have had to be complemented by the characterizations of human institutions, social norms, organizational networks, and power relations (Dow 2000, Ostrom 2012). Adding to this complexity of social organization is the fact that all of these components change over time and have different spatial extents (Machlis et al 1997, Cadenasso et al 2006.…”
Section: Ecology Of the Citymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our approach uses a framework to systematically manage diverse information about CF and is published as Lawrence and Ambrose-Oji (2013). The framework organises evidence and data around a set of 'design principles' widely found to support successful common property management (Ostrom, 2012), including context and history which are important keys to understanding CF (Danks, 2009). This generates a descriptive point-in-time 'profile' of each case using a common set of 'variables'.…”
Section: Research Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%